FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>   >|  
atural barrier, you see that it is going to be relatively easy, so far as the State of New York is concerned, to put some sort of an artificial barrier across the little neck there. This all depends on what can be done in Pennsylvania. This cross-hatching of red along the Delaware River represents an area in which the infection is only partial, and the few dots of red shown about Binghamton represent localities in which the blight has now been exterminated. The diseased trees have been taken out, stumps killed, and bark burned. We are in hopes the disease will not reappear there. I don't believe things have been definitely settled at Albany in the Department of Agriculture, where the control work naturally lies, but Commissioner Pearson is very anxious that something be done to try to control or prevent the further spread of the disease in our state. Plans are being made so that a large number of men will be located in this territory next summer, making very careful inspection, removing the occasional diseased trees, killing stumps, and burning bark; and a forester will be connected with the work, for the purpose of advising with regard to the use of the diseased timber. I might call attention to the fact that our state agricultural law, as it now reads, empowers our Commissioner of Agriculture to quarantine against this or any other dangerous fungous disease,--a very broad step from what it was before that time, when the only fungous disease he had any power to act against was the black knot of plums. Mr. Reed: From the chart, it appears that the disease is more common in the vicinity of streams and bodies of water. Professor Reddick: That is an observation that has often been recorded. Mr. Reed: How is it elsewhere than in New York? Professor Collins? The question has been asked more often than otherwise, why do we find the disease on the tops of hills away from the water? I think there isn't a sufficient amount of evidence or observation on that point to say whether it is more common near or away from bodies of water. I will call your attention to one experiment that can be performed by anybody with the microscope. Take a piece of one of those spore horns or threads, put it in a drop of water on a microscope slide. Inside of two minutes, it will disappear entirely. It is dissipated in the water, and the spores are so small you cannot see them with the naked eye. If you let the water dry on the slide, then p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

disease

 

diseased

 

Commissioner

 
stumps
 

Agriculture

 
control
 

observation

 
Professor
 

microscope

 

bodies


common

 

attention

 

fungous

 

barrier

 
Collins
 
recorded
 
question
 

streams

 

artificial

 

concerned


vicinity
 

appears

 

Reddick

 
disappear
 

dissipated

 

minutes

 

atural

 

Inside

 
spores
 
threads

amount
 

evidence

 
sufficient
 

experiment

 
performed
 

Albany

 

Department

 

Delaware

 

settled

 

things


naturally

 

anxious

 

Pennsylvania

 

Pearson

 

hatching

 

exterminated

 

localities

 
represent
 

Binghamton

 

partial