FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266  
267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   >>   >|  
and anarchy. And to this he listened the more easily, from my known disapprobation of the British treaty. I never saw him afterwards, or these malignant insinuations should have been dissipated before his just judgment, as mists before the sun. I felt on his death, with my countrymen, that 'verily a great man hath fallen this day in Israel.' More time and recollection would enable me to add many other traits of his character; but why add them to you, who knew him well? And I cannot justify to myself a longer detention of your paper. _Vale, proprieque tuum me esse tibi persuadeas_. Th: Jefferson. LETTER CXVIII.--TO JOSEPH C. CABELL, January 31, 1814 TO JOSEPH C. CABELL. Monticello, January 31, 1814. Dear Sir, Your favor of the 23d is received. Say had come to hand safely. But I regretted having asked the return of him; for I did not find in him one new idea on the subject I had been contemplating; nothing more than a succinct, judicious digest of the tedious pages of Smith. You ask my opinion on the question, whether the States can add any qualifications to those which the constitution has prescribed for their members of Congress? It is a question I had never before reflected on; yet had taken up an off-hand opinion, agreeing with your first, that they could not: that to add new qualifications to those of the constitution, would be as much an alteration, as to detract from them. And so I think the House of Representatives of Congress decided in some case; I believe that of a member from Baltimore. But your letter having induced me to look into the constitution, and to consider the question a little, I am again in your predicament, of doubting the correctness of my first opinion. Had the constitution been silent, nobody can doubt but that the right to prescribe all the qualifications and disqualifications of those they would send to represent them, would have belonged to the State. So also the constitution might have prescribed the whole, and excluded all others. It seems to have preferred the middle way. It has exercised the power in part, by declaring some disqualifications, to wit, those of not being twenty-five years of age, of not having been a citizen seven years, and of not being an inhabitant of the State at the time of election. But it does not declare, itself, that the member shall not be a lunatic, a pauper, a convict of treason, of murder, of felony, or other infamous crime, or a non-
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266  
267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

constitution

 

qualifications

 

opinion

 

question

 

JOSEPH

 

disqualifications

 

prescribed

 

CABELL

 

January

 

member


Congress

 

declare

 

detract

 
alteration
 

inhabitant

 

election

 
Representatives
 
decided
 

lunatic

 

felony


murder

 

treason

 
infamous
 

middle

 

reflected

 

agreeing

 

convict

 

pauper

 

citizen

 

prescribe


silent

 

doubting

 

correctness

 

members

 

belonged

 

exercised

 

represent

 

predicament

 

induced

 

preferred


Baltimore

 

letter

 

declaring

 
excluded
 

twenty

 

recollection

 

enable

 

Israel

 
fallen
 
traits