FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92  
93   94   95   >>  
working hypothesis, calculated to explain problems otherwise inexplicable. There were evolutionists before Darwin, from Lamarck and the author of the _Vestiges of Creation_ to Herbert Spencer; but as there was no evidence to bear out the orthodox creational view of the Book of _Genesis_, enlarged upon in detail by Milton, so before Darwin the evidence in favour of the transmutation of species was wholly insufficient, and no suggestion which had been made to the causes of the assumed transmutation was in any way adequate to explain the phenomena. Under such conditions only an agnostic attitude was possible. "So," writes Huxley-- I took refuge in that "_thaetige Skepsis_," which Goethe has so well defined, and, reversing the apostolic precept to be all things to all men, I usually defended the tenability of the received doctrines when I had to do with the transmutationists, and stood up for the possibility of transmutation among the orthodox, thereby, no doubt, increasing an already current, but quite undeserved, reputation for needless combativeness. Then came the publication of the Darwin-Wallace paper in 1858, and of the _Origin_ in 1859, the effect of which he compares to-- the flash of light which, to a man who has lost himself on a dark night, suddenly reveals a road which, whether it takes him straight home or not, certainly goes his way. That which we were looking for, and could not find, was an hypothesis respecting the origin of known organic forms which assumed the operation of no causes but such as could be proved to be actually at work. We wanted, not to pin our faith to that or any other speculation, but to get hold of clear and definite conceptions which could be brought face to face with facts and have their validity tested. The _Origin_ provided us with the working hypothesis we sought. Moreover, it did the immense service of freeing us for ever from the dilemma--refuse to accept the creation hypothesis and what have you to propose that can be accepted by any cautious reasoner? In 1857 I had no answer ready, and I do not think that any one else had. A year later we reproached ourselves with dullness for being perplexed with such an inquiry. My reflection, when I first made myself master of the central idea of the _Origin_, was: "How extremely stupid not to have thought of that." I suppose
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92  
93   94   95   >>  



Top keywords:
hypothesis
 

Darwin

 

Origin

 
transmutation
 

assumed

 

orthodox

 

explain

 

working

 

evidence

 

definite


straight

 
validity
 

conceptions

 
brought
 
respecting
 

proved

 

origin

 

operation

 

organic

 

wanted


speculation

 

creation

 

dullness

 

perplexed

 

inquiry

 
reproached
 

reflection

 

extremely

 

stupid

 

thought


suppose

 

master

 
central
 

freeing

 

service

 

dilemma

 

refuse

 

immense

 

provided

 

sought


Moreover
 
accept
 

reasoner

 

answer

 

cautious

 
accepted
 

propose

 
tested
 
publication
 

phenomena