FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   >>  
The relative magnitudes, while intended to be only approximate, are still shown with sufficient accuracy for the purpose of the research, and the diagrams are, in general, faithful tracings from the original memoranda. [Mr. Todd transcribes the observing book entire.] * * * * * [AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF AND DUMB.] NOTES ON MANUAL SPELLING. The inestimable value of speech-reading and the practicability of its acquisition under favorable conditions is a matter of common experience and observation but justice to the deaf requires a recognition of the fact that speech-reading has its limitations. Certain English words, chiefly short ones, are practically alike to the speech-reader and the context may fail sometimes to give a clew. It is necessary, at times, in communicating with even expert speech-readers, to have recourse to writing or oral spelling to convey the names of persons, places, technical terms, etc., not in common use. Moreover, it is convenient to have accurate and rapid means of conversation under unfavorable conditions as to light and distance, or when from any cause the deaf person's voice cannot be heard. Writing is slow, inconvenient, and often impossible. Writing upon the palm of the hand was proposed by the Abbe Deschamps in 1778, as utilizing the sense of touch, and was used in darkness by him as a substitute for speech, but it is neither accurate nor rapid. Writing in the air[1] with the finger is also slow and uncertain, while the action is unpleasantly conspicuous. [Footnote 1: The brilliant but wily Sicard, whose "show" pupils were accustomed to honoring drafts at sight in appropriate responses to all sorts of questions, acting upon the motto, _Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur_, schooled certain pupils in deciphering writing in the air, and was thus prepared, in emergencies at his public exhibitions, to convey intimations of the answers, while supposed to be using "signs" in putting questions.] Finger-spelling would appear to be a far more convenient, easy, rapid, and accurate adjunct to speech or substitute for it than writing. It is a common error to consider the ordinary manual alphabets as deaf-mute alphabets and finger-spelling as the sign-language of the deaf. Finger-spelling is to the deaf a borrowed art. It is used by many of the educated deaf and their friends as a substitute for the sign-language, and it enables them also to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   >>  



Top keywords:

speech

 
spelling
 

Writing

 

common

 

accurate

 

substitute

 

writing

 

reading

 
questions
 

alphabets


convey

 

conditions

 

language

 

convenient

 

finger

 
Finger
 

pupils

 

brilliant

 
Footnote
 

conspicuous


uncertain

 

action

 

unpleasantly

 

borrowed

 
darkness
 

proposed

 

enables

 

inconvenient

 

impossible

 

Deschamps


friends

 

educated

 
utilizing
 
honoring
 

exhibitions

 

intimations

 

answers

 

supposed

 

public

 

ordinary


prepared

 
emergencies
 

adjunct

 

putting

 

deciphering

 

responses

 

drafts

 

accustomed

 
acting
 
decipiatur