FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244  
245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  
nce of as many organisms as it presents morphological segments. Professor Haeckel adduces the fossil _Crossopodia_ and _Phyllodocites_ as examples of the Annelidan forms, by the coalescence of which the Echinoderms may have been produced; but, even supposing the resemblance of these worms to detached starfish arms to be perfect, it is possible that they may be the extreme term, and not the commencement, of Echinoderm development. A pentacrinoid Echinoderm, with a complete jointed stalk, is developed within the larva of _Antedon_. Is it not possible that the larva of _Crossopodia_ may have developed a vermiform Echinoderm? With respect to the Phylogeny of the _Arthropoda_, I find myself disposed to take a somewhat different view from that of Professor Haeckel. He assumes that the primary stock of the whole group was a crustacean, having that _Nauplius_ form in which Fritz Mueller has shown that so many _Crustacea_ commence their lives. All the _Entomostraca_ arose by the modification of some one or other of these Naupliform "_Archicarida_." Other _Archicarida_ underwent a further metamorphosis into a _Zoaea_-form. From some of these "_Zoeopoda_" arose all the remaining Malacostracous _Crustacea_; while, from others, was developed some form analogous to the existing _Galeodes_, out of which proceeded, by gradual differentiation, all the _Myriapoda, Arachnida,_ and _Insecta_. I should, be disposed to interpret the facts of the embryological history and of the anatomy of the _Arthropoda_ in a different manner. The _Copepoda_, the _Ostracoda_, and the _Branchiopoda_ are the _Crustacea_ which have departed least from the embryonic or _Nauplius_-forms; and, of these, I imagine that the _Copepoda_ represent the hypothetical _Archicarida_ most closely. _Apus_ and _Sapphirina_ indicate the relations of these Archaeocarids with the _Trilobita_, and the _Eurypterida_ connect the _Trilobita_ and the _Copepoda_ with the _Xiphosura_. But the _Xiphosura_ have such close morphological relations with the _Arachnida_, and especially with the oldest known Arachnidan, _Scorpio_, that I cannot doubt the existence of a genetic connection between the two groups. On the other hand, the _Branchiopoda_ do, even at the present day, almost pass into the true _Podophthalmia_, by _Nebalia_. By the _Trilobita_, again, the _Archicarida_ are connected with such _Edriophthalmia_ as _Serolis_. The _Stomapoda_ are extremely modified _Edriophthalmia_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244  
245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  



Top keywords:

Archicarida

 

developed

 

Trilobita

 

Copepoda

 

Crustacea

 

Echinoderm

 

Xiphosura

 

Nauplius

 

Branchiopoda

 

Crossopodia


Haeckel

 

Arachnida

 

disposed

 
Arthropoda
 

Professor

 

Edriophthalmia

 
relations
 
morphological
 

represent

 

imagine


embryonic

 

hypothetical

 
gradual
 

differentiation

 

Myriapoda

 

proceeded

 

analogous

 

existing

 

Galeodes

 

Insecta


anatomy

 

manner

 

Ostracoda

 

history

 

embryological

 

interpret

 

departed

 

present

 

groups

 

Podophthalmia


Stomapoda

 

extremely

 

modified

 
Serolis
 

connected

 

Nebalia

 

connect

 

Eurypterida

 
Archaeocarids
 
Sapphirina