FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34  
35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   >>   >|  
which is at our command. For this reason we must not expect to obtain a full and connected account of any series of events beyond the reach of history. But the testimony of geological monuments, if frequently imperfect, possesses at least the advantage of being free from all intentional misrepresentation. We may be deceived in the inferences which we draw, in the same manner as we often mistake the nature and import of phenomena observed in the daily course of nature; but our liability to err is confined to the interpretation, and, if this be correct, our information is certain. It was long before the distinct nature and legitimate objects of geology were fully recognized, and it was at first confounded with many other branches of inquiry, just as the limits of history, poetry, and mythology were ill-defined in the infancy of civilization. Even in Werner's time, or at the close of the eighteenth century, geology appears to have been regarded as little other than a subordinate department of mineralogy; and Desmarest included it under the head of Physical Geography. But the most common and serious source of confusion arose from the notion, that it was the business of geology to discover the mode in which the earth originated, or, as some imagined, to study the effects of those cosmological causes which were employed by the Author of Nature to bring this planet out of a nascent and chaotic state into a more perfect and habitable condition. Hutton was the first who endeavored to draw a strong line of demarcation between his favorite science and cosmogony, for he declared that geology was in nowise concerned "with questions as to the origin of things." An attempt will be made in the sequel of this work to demonstrate that geology differs as widely from cosmogony, as speculations concerning the mode of the first creation of man differ from history. But, before entering more at large on this controverted question, it will be desirable to trace the progress of opinion on this topic, from the earliest ages to the commencement of the present century. CHAPTER II. HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE PROGRESS OF GEOLOGY. Oriental Cosmogony--Hymns of the Vedas--Institutes of Menu--Doctrine of the successive destruction and renovation of the world--Origin of this doctrine--Common to the Egyptians--Adopted by the Greeks--System of Pythagoras--Of Aristotle--Dogmas concerning the extinction and reproduction
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34  
35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

geology

 
history
 

nature

 

century

 

cosmogony

 

science

 

favorite

 

attempt

 
origin
 

things


questions

 

concerned

 

declared

 

nowise

 

Nature

 
Author
 

planet

 

employed

 
imagined
 

effects


cosmological

 

nascent

 

chaotic

 

strong

 
endeavored
 

demarcation

 

sequel

 

Hutton

 

perfect

 

habitable


condition

 

successive

 
Doctrine
 
destruction
 

renovation

 

Institutes

 

Oriental

 

GEOLOGY

 

Cosmogony

 

Origin


doctrine

 
Aristotle
 

Dogmas

 

extinction

 

reproduction

 

Pythagoras

 

System

 

Common

 
Egyptians
 
Adopted