FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282  
283   284   285   286   287   >>  
r exposed to view, but pressed flat against the table. Then give the subject a pencil and a second sheet of paper like the one already used and say: "_Take this piece of paper and make a drawing to show how the other sheet of paper would look if it were unfolded. Draw lines to show the creases in the paper and show what results from the cutting._" The subject is not permitted to fold the second sheet, but must solve the problem by the imagination unaided. Note that we do not say, "_Draw the holes_," as this would inform the subject that more than one hole is expected. SCORING. The test is passed _if the creases in the paper are properly represented, if the holes are drawn in the correct number, and if they are located correctly_, that is, both on the same crease and each about halfway between the center of the paper and the side. The shape of the holes is disregarded. Failure may be due to error as regards the creases or the number and location of the holes, or it may involve any combination of the above errors. REMARKS. Success seems to depend upon constructive visual imagination. The subject must first be able to construct in imagination the creases which result from the folding, and secondly, to picture the effects of the cutting as regards number of holes and their location. It appears that a solution is seldom arrived at, even in the case of college students, by logical mathematical thinking. Our unschooled subjects even succeeded somewhat better than high-school and college students of the same mental level. Binet placed this test in year XIII of the 1908 scale, but shifted it to the adult group in the 1911 revision. Goddard retains it in the adult group, while Kuhlmann places it in year XV. There have also been certain variations in the procedure employed. As given in the Stanford revision the test is passed by hardly any subjects below the 14-year level, but by about one third of "average adults" and by the large majority of "superior adults." SUPERIOR ADULT, 3: REPEATING EIGHT DIGITS PROCEDURE and SCORING, the same as in previous tests with digits reversed. The series used are: 7-2-5-3-4-8-9-6; 4-9-8-5-3-7-6-2; and 8-3-7-9-5-4-8-2. Guard against rhythm and grouping in reading the digits and do not give warning as to the number to be given. The test is passed by about one third of "average adults" and by over two thirds of "superior adults." The test shows no marked difference between e
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282  
283   284   285   286   287   >>  



Top keywords:

adults

 
creases
 

number

 
subject
 

imagination

 

passed

 

SCORING

 

revision

 

location

 

average


superior

 

cutting

 
students
 

college

 

digits

 

subjects

 
thinking
 

school

 
places
 

shifted


mental
 

Goddard

 

Kuhlmann

 

retains

 

unschooled

 

succeeded

 

thirds

 

previous

 

PROCEDURE

 

DIGITS


rhythm

 

grouping

 

reading

 
reversed
 
series
 

REPEATING

 

mathematical

 
Stanford
 

employed

 

procedure


variations

 

marked

 

SUPERIOR

 

majority

 

warning

 
difference
 

REMARKS

 
problem
 

unaided

 

results