FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402  
403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   >>  
derably from both, and "no two sets of pendulum experiments give the same result."[335] The same liability to error, and uncertainty of the actual truth, attends the other modes of ascertaining this fundamental measurement. A very small error here will vitiate all other astronomical calculations; for the earth's radius, and the radius of its orbit, are the foot-rule and surveyor's chain with which the astronomer measures the heavens. But this last and most used standard is uncertain; and of the nine different estimates, it is certain that eight must be wrong; and probably that all are erroneous. For example, Encke, in 1761, gives the earth's distance from the sun at 95,141,830 Encke, in 1769, 95,820,610 Lacaille, 76,927,900 Henderson, 90,164,110 Gillies and Gould, 96,160,000 Mayer, 104,097,100 Le Verrier, 91,066,350 Sir John Herschel, 91,718,000 Humboldt, 82,728,000[336] Here now is the fundamental standard measure of astronomy; and nine first-class astronomers are set to determine its length; but their measurements range all the way from seventy-seven to one hundred and four millions of miles--a difference of nearly one-fourth. Why the old-fashioned finger and thumb measure used before the carpenter's two-foot rule was invented never made such discrepancies; it could always make a foot within an inch more or less; but our scientific measurers, it seems, can not guess within two inches on the foot. Their smaller measurements are equally inaccurate. Lias says the Aurora Borealis is only two and a half miles high; Hood and Richardson make its height double that, or five miles; Olmsted and Twining run it up to forty-two, one hundred, and one hundred and sixty miles![337] When they are thus inaccurate in the measurement of a phenomenon so near the earth, how can we believe in the infallibility of their measurements of the distances of the stars and the nebulae in the distant heavens? The moon is the nearest to us of all the heavenly bodies, and exercises the greatest influence of any, save the sun, upon our crops, ships, health and lives, and consequently has had a larger share of astronomical attention than any other celestial body. But the most conflicting statements are made by astronomers regarding her state and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402  
403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   >>  



Top keywords:

measurements

 

hundred

 

heavens

 
radius
 

inaccurate

 

standard

 

fundamental

 
measure
 

measurement

 

astronomers


astronomical

 

smaller

 

equally

 

Aurora

 

fashioned

 

Borealis

 

finger

 

discrepancies

 
Richardson
 

carpenter


measurers

 
scientific
 

invented

 
inches
 

health

 

exercises

 
bodies
 
greatest
 

influence

 

larger


statements
 
conflicting
 

attention

 

celestial

 
heavenly
 

double

 

Olmsted

 
Twining
 

phenomenon

 

nebulae


distant

 

nearest

 

distances

 
infallibility
 

height

 

uncertain

 
estimates
 
measures
 
astronomer
 

surveyor