FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  
e, an incorrect answer may properly be followed up so as to lead the pupil into a contradiction, but it is usually not desirable to embarrass him unnecessarily. It is never agreeable to be covered with the confusion which such a situation usually brings about. The other phase of the Socratic method, the _maieutics_, consisted in leading the pupil, by a further series of questions, to formulate the correct opinion of which the first hastily-given answer was only a fragment. This coincides with the developing method and may sometimes be profitably employed with young children. EXAMPLE OF SOCRATIC QUESTIONING.--As an example of Socratic questioning may be noted the following taken from Plato's _Minos_. Socrates has questioned his companion concerning the nature of Law and has received the answer, "Law is the decree of the city." To show his companion the inadequacy of this definition, Socrates engages with him in the following dialogue: _Socrates_: Justice and law, are highly honourable; injustice and lawlessness, highly dishonourable; the former preserves cities, the latter ruins them? _Pupil_: Yes, it does. _Socrates_: Well, then! we must consider law as something honourable; and seek after it, under the assumption that it is a good thing. You defined law to be the decree of the city: Are not some decrees good, others evil? _Pupil_: Unquestionably. _Socrates_: But we have already said that law is not evil? _Pupil_: I admit it. _Socrates_: It is incorrect therefore to answer, as you did broadly, that law is the decree of the city. An evil decree cannot be law. _Pupil_: I see that it is incorrect. Having shown his pupil the fallacy of his first definition, Socrates proceeds to teach him that only what is right is lawful. This part of the dialogue proceeds as follows: _Socrates_: Those who know, must of necessity hold the same opinion with each other, on matters which they know: always and everywhere? _Pupil_: Yes--always and everywhere. _Socrates_: Physicians write respecting matters of health what they account to be true, and these writings of theirs are the medical laws? _Pupil_: Certainly they are. _Socrates_: The like is true respecting the laws of farming, the laws of gardening, the laws of cookery. All these are the writings of persons, knowing in each of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Socrates

 

decree

 
answer
 

incorrect

 
dialogue
 

opinion

 
matters
 
companion
 

proceeds

 

definition


writings
 
method
 

highly

 

honourable

 

Socratic

 
respecting
 

Unquestionably

 

decrees

 
defined
 

assumption


health

 

account

 
Physicians
 

medical

 

Certainly

 

persons

 

knowing

 
cookery
 
gardening
 

farming


necessity

 

broadly

 

Having

 
lawful
 
fallacy
 

series

 

leading

 
consisted
 

maieutics

 

questions


formulate

 
fragment
 

coincides

 
developing
 

correct

 
hastily
 

brings

 

situation

 

contradiction

 

properly