FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127  
128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>   >|  
uggest compounds of _pater_ and _mater_, not as being specially appropriate, but as being parallel to matrilineal and patrilineal, denoting descent in the female and male lines respectively. For the somewhat complicated relationships of _potestas_ in the family I propose two main divisions, (_a_) patri-potestal, (_b_) matri-potestal; the latter may be further subdivided according as the authority is in the hands (1) of the actual mother, (2) of the maternal uncles, (3) of the mother's relatives in general, and so on. FOOTNOTES: [141] The _pirrauru_ union is preceded by a ceremony, but this is no proof that primitive group marriage, if it existed, was contracted in the same way. [142] Dissimilar polygamy is, in respect of the inferior spouses, hardly to be distinguished from promiscuity, save that the number of them is limited. But in Australia the lending of _pirraurus_ sweeps away even this distinction. [143] He says family, or Cyclopean family. Harem in fact is the idea. [144] i.e. not life-long. CHAPTER XI. GROUP MARRIAGE AND MORGAN'S THEORIES. Passage from Promiscuity. Reformatory Movements. Incest. Relative harmfulness of such unions. Natural aversion. Australian facts. The arguments for group marriage in Australia are of two kinds--(1) from the terms of relationship, that is to say of a mixed philological and sociological character, and (2) from the customs of the Australian tribes. The argument from the terms of relationship is so intimately connected with the theories of Lewis Morgan that it may be well to give a brief critical survey of Morgan's hypotheses. I therefore begin the treatment of this part of the subject by a statement of Morgan's views on the general question of the origin and development of human marriage. As a result of his enquiries into terms of relationships, mainly in North America and Asia, Morgan drew up a scheme of fifteen stages, through which he believed the sexual relations of human beings had passed in the interval between utter savagery and the civilised family. We are only concerned with the earlier portion of his scheme. It is not even necessary to discuss that in all its details. Morgan's first eight (properly five) stages are: I. Promiscuous Intercourse. II. Intermarriage or Cohabitation of Brothers and Sisters. III. The Communal Family (First stage of the Family). IV. The Hawaian Custom of Punalua[145], giving the Malayan Form of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127  
128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Morgan

 

family

 

marriage

 

mother

 

general

 

Australia

 

relationship

 

stages

 

scheme

 

Australian


relationships

 

Family

 

potestal

 

subject

 

Custom

 

statement

 

treatment

 

survey

 
hypotheses
 

Punalua


question

 
result
 

enquiries

 

Hawaian

 

development

 

arguments

 

origin

 

critical

 

sociological

 
character

customs
 

tribes

 

philological

 

giving

 
argument
 
theories
 
intimately
 

connected

 
Malayan
 

Promiscuous


civilised

 

Intercourse

 

savagery

 

interval

 

concerned

 

discuss

 

details

 

properly

 

earlier

 

portion