FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  
-for statement. "I mean it," said the barrister. "Look at all I have learnt to-day whilst darting about London in that particular hansom, which, mind you, I carefully selected from a rank of twenty. Abandon it until I am dropped at my starting-point! Never!" Winter sighed. "I never feel that way about anything on wheels," he said. "Do you really think you will be able to clear up this affair, sir? It seems to me to be a bigger muddle now than when I left it after the second trial. Don't laugh at me. That is awkwardly put, I know. But then we had a straightforward crime to deal with. Now, goodness knows where we have landed." Smith entered, and commenced laying the table. Brett did not reply to the detective's spoken reverie. Both men idly watched the deft servant's preparations. "Smith," suddenly cried the master of the household, "what sort of chicken have we for dinner?" "Cold chicken, sir." "Thank you. As you seem to demand Miltonic precision in phrase, I amend my words. What breed of chicken have we for dinner?" "A dorking, sir." "And how do you know it is a dorking?" "Oh, there's lots of ways of knowin' that, sir. You can tell by the size, by its head and feet, and by the tuft of feathers left on its neck." "Q.E.D." "Beg pardon, sir!" "I was only saying, 'Right you are!'" Smith went out, and Brett turned to his companion: "Did you note Smith's philosophy in the matter of dorkings?" he inquired. "Yes." "Does it convey no moral to you? I fear not. Now mark me, Winter. Just as the breed of the chicken is indelibly stamped on it in the eyes of a man skilled in chickens, so is the murder we are investigating marked by characteristics so plain that a child of ten, properly trained to use his eyes, might discern them. What you and I suffer from are defects implanted by idle nursemaids and doting mothers. Let us, for the moment, adopt the policy of the theosophists and sit in consultation apart from our astral bodies. Who killed Sir Alan Hume-Frazer? I answer, a relative. What relative? Someone we do not know, whom he did not know, or who committed murder because he was known. What sort of person is the murderer? A man physically like either David or Robert, so like that 'Rabbit Jack' would swear to the identity of either of them as readily as to the person of the real murderer. Why did he use such a weird instrument as the Ko-Katana? Because he found it under his hand and recognised
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

chicken

 

murder

 

dinner

 

relative

 

Winter

 

person

 

murderer

 

dorking

 

indelibly

 

stamped


investigating
 

chickens

 

skilled

 
marked
 
characteristics
 
pardon
 

turned

 
companion
 

convey

 

inquired


philosophy

 

matter

 

dorkings

 

mothers

 

physically

 

Robert

 

Rabbit

 

Someone

 

answer

 

committed


identity
 
Because
 
Katana
 

recognised

 

instrument

 

readily

 

Frazer

 

implanted

 
nursemaids
 
doting

feathers

 

defects

 
suffer
 

properly

 
trained
 

discern

 
moment
 

bodies

 

astral

 
killed