FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  
of course, be a trait of character in the person delivering it; but, in that case, it will generally be mendacious (for instance, Falstaff and the men in buckram). Or it may be introduced for the sake of its effect upon the characters to whom the narration is addressed. But in these cases its purpose is no longer to convey information to the audience--it belongs, not to the "intelligence department," but to the department of analysis.] [Footnote 7: I say "variety" rather than complexity because I take it that the emotions of all concerned are here too intense to be very complex. The effect of the scene would appear to lie in the rapidly increasing intensity of comparatively simple emotions in Hamlet, in the King, in the Queen, and in the amazed and bewildered courtiers.] [Footnote 8: This excludes _Love's Comedy, Brand, Peer Gynt_, and _Emperor and Galilean_.] [Footnote 9: See, for example, _King Henry VIII_, Act IV, and the opening scene of Tennyson's _Queen Mary_.] [Footnote 10: This rule of economy does not necessarily exclude a group of characters performing something like the function of the antique Chorus; that is to say, commenting upon the action from a more or less disinterested point of view. The function of _Kaffee-Klatsch_ in _Pillars of Society_ is not at all that of the Chorus, but rather that of the Euripidean Prologue, somewhat thinly disguised.] [Footnote 11: It is perhaps worth nothing that Gabriele d'Annunzio in _La Gioconda_, reverts to, and outdoes, the French classic convention, by giving us three actors and four confidants. The play consists of a crisis in three lives, passively, though sympathetically, contemplated by what is in effect a Chorus of two men and two women. It would be interesting to inquire why, in this particular play, such an abuse of the confidant seems quite admissible, if not conspicuously right.] [Footnote 12: Dryden, in his _Essay of Dramatic Poesy_, represents this method as being characteristic of Greek tragedy as a whole. The tragic poet, he says, "set the audience, as it were, at the post where the race is to be concluded; and, saving them the tedious expectation of seeing the poet set out and ride the beginning of the course, they suffer you not to behold him, till he is in sight of the goal and just upon you." Dryden seems to think that the method was forced upon them by "the rule of time."] [Footnote 13: It is a rash enterprise to reconstruct Ibsen, but
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 
effect
 

Chorus

 

emotions

 

department

 

method

 

Dryden

 

function

 
characters
 

audience


generally

 

instance

 

inquire

 

interesting

 

Falstaff

 
admissible
 

conspicuously

 

mendacious

 
confidant
 

contemplated


French

 

classic

 

convention

 

outdoes

 
reverts
 

Annunzio

 

Gioconda

 

giving

 

crisis

 

passively


consists

 

confidants

 
buckram
 
actors
 

sympathetically

 

suffer

 

behold

 

beginning

 

expectation

 

enterprise


reconstruct

 
forced
 

tedious

 

characteristic

 

tragedy

 

Dramatic

 

Gabriele

 

represents

 
tragic
 
delivering