FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  
joint occupancy, is well known; and that they have, in some instances, left their monuments in places wherein even tradition had almost lost sight of their former sojourn, is susceptible of proof. Mr. Gregg, in a recent and instructive work on the "Commerce of the Prairies," states the following particulars, which are the more valuable since he had no opinions of his own in reference to the American aborigines, and merely gives the facts as he found them. Mr. Gregg describes the ruins called _La Gran Quivira_, about 100 miles south of Santa Fe, as larger than the present capital of New Mexico. The architecture of this deserted city is of hewn stone, and there are the remains of aqueducts eight or ten miles in length leading from the neighboring mountains. These ruins "have been supposed to be the remains of a _pueblo_ or aboriginal city;" but he adds that the occurrence of the Spanish coat of arms in more than one instance sculptured and painted upon the houses, prevents the adoption of such an opinion; and that traditional report (and tradition only) mentions this as a city that was sacked and desolated in the Indian insurrection of 1680.[12-*] Now had it not been for the occurrence of the heraldic paintings, this city might have been still regarded as of purely Indian origin and occupancy; as might also the analogous ruins of Abo, Tagique and Chilili in the same vicinity; for although these may have been originally constructed by the natives, yet as they are supposed to be near the ancient mines, it is not improbable that the conquerors in these, as in many other instances, drove out the rightful owners, and took possession for themselves;[12-+] for that they did possess and inhabit the towns above enumerated is a fact beyond question. Why may not events of an analogous character have taken place at Panuco? Was it not probably an Indian city into which the Spaniards had intruded themselves, and having left traces of their sojourn, as at _La Gran Quivira_, subsequently, owing to some dire catastrophe, or some new impulse, abandonded[TN-2] it for another and preferable location? This, we suggest, is a reasonable explanation of the presence of the Caucasian effigy found by Mr. Norman among the deserted ruins of Panuco. Mr. Stephens has, I think, conclusively proved that the past and present Indian races of Mexico were cognate tribes. I had previously arrived at the same conclusion from a different kind of evidenc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  



Top keywords:

Indian

 

Mexico

 

Panuco

 

Quivira

 

present

 
occurrence
 

remains

 

deserted

 

supposed

 

analogous


instances
 

tradition

 

sojourn

 

occupancy

 

owners

 

rightful

 

conquerors

 
inhabit
 

possess

 

possession


improbable

 

vicinity

 

conclusion

 

Chilili

 

evidenc

 

Tagique

 
arrived
 
previously
 

proved

 
ancient

cognate

 

natives

 

tribes

 
originally
 

constructed

 

explanation

 

reasonable

 

subsequently

 
intruded
 

traces


catastrophe

 

preferable

 

abandonded

 

suggest

 

impulse

 

Spaniards

 
presence
 
events
 

character

 

question