FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201  
1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   >>   >|  
mocratic party to a fair and distinct issue on questions involved in the presidential campaign. Now for more than thirty years that party has been merely an opposition party, opposed to everything that we proposed, and having no principles or propositions of their own to present. They declared the war a failure; they were opposed to the homestead law, they were opposed to the greenback; they were opposed to everything that we did, but now, thank God, they have agreed to have one or two or three issues to be determined by the people." I then stated the issues involved in the canvass in very much the same terms as in Philadelphia, but the speech in New York was made without notes and was literally reported in the "Tribune," while the Philadelphia speech was prepared and followed as closely as possible, without reference to manuscript. I have now read the two speeches carefully, and while the subject-matter is the same in both, the language, form and connection are as different as if delivered by two distinct persons who had not conferred with each other. My long experience convinces me that while it is safe for a person to write what he intends to say, yet it is better to carefully study the subject and then to speak without reference to notes or manuscript. This depends, however, upon the temperament and poise of the speaker. Nothing is more discouraging to an audience than to hear a speech read, except it be the attempt to speak offhand by a person who has not acquired a full knowledge of the subject-matter and does not possess the art of recalling and arranging the method of his address. I believe my speech in New York covered all the issues involved in the canvass fairly and fully stated. I arraigned the Democratic party, especially for its declaration in 1864 that the war was a failure, when Grant was holding on with his deadly grip, and when Sherman and Sheridan were riding to battle and to victory. This declaration was more injurious to the Union cause than any victory by the Confederates during the war. I closed with the following reference to the respective candidates: "The Republican party has nominated for President, Benjamin Harrison. When a lawyer in full practice, the sound of the enemy's guns came to his ears, the call of Lincoln filled his heart, and he entered the army. He fought through the war, a brave and gallant soldier. He returned again to his profession and to his wife and child,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201  
1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

speech

 

opposed

 
subject
 

reference

 

issues

 

involved

 

Philadelphia

 

canvass

 

stated

 
person

victory
 

distinct

 

declaration

 
carefully
 
matter
 

manuscript

 

failure

 
knowledge
 

attempt

 
battle

holding

 
acquired
 
Sherman
 

offhand

 

deadly

 

riding

 
Sheridan
 

possess

 

covered

 
arranging

method
 

address

 

fairly

 

recalling

 

mocratic

 

Democratic

 

arraigned

 

Lincoln

 

filled

 
profession

entered
 
soldier
 

returned

 

gallant

 

fought

 
practice
 

respective

 

candidates

 

closed

 

Confederates