FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338  
339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   >>   >|  
elves to pay money at a future day for services rendered or money borrowed.[1551] Bills issued by State banks are not bills of credit;[1552] it is immaterial that the State is the sole stockholder of the bank,[1553] that the officers of the bank were elected by the State legislature,[1554] or that the capital of the bank was raised by the sale of State bonds.[1555] LEGAL TENDER Relying on this clause, which applies only to the States and not to the Federal Government,[1556] the Supreme Court has held that where the marshal of a State court received State bank notes in payment and discharge of an execution, the creditor was entitled to demand payment in gold or silver.[1557] Since, however, there is nothing in the Constitution which prohibits a bank depositor from consenting when he draws a check, that payment may be made by draft, a State law which provided that checks drawn on local banks should, at the option of the bank, be payable in exchange drafts was held valid.[1558] BILLS OF ATTAINDER Statutes passed after the Civil War with the intent and result of excluding persons who had aided the Confederacy from following certain callings, by the device of requiring them to take an oath that they had never given such aid, were held invalid as being bills of attainder, as well as _ex post facto_ laws.[1559] EX POST FACTO LAWS Scope of Provision This clause, like the cognate restriction imposed on the Federal Government by section 9, relates only to penal and criminal legislation and not to civil laws which affect private rights adversely.[1560] It is directed only against legislative action and does not touch erroneous or inconsistent decisions by the courts.[1561] Even though a law is _ex post facto_ and invalid as to crimes committed prior to its enactment, it is nonetheless valid as to subsequent offenses.[1562] If it mitigates the rigor of the law in force at the time the crime was committed,[1563] or if it merely penalizes the continuance of conduct which was lawfully begun before its passage, the statute is not _ex post facto_. Thus measures penalizing the failure of a railroad to cut drains through existing embankments,[1564] or making illegal the continued possession of intoxicating liquors which were lawfully acquired,[1565] have been held valid. Denial of Future Privileges to Past Offenders The right to practice a profession may be denied to one who was convicted of an offense befor
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338  
339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

payment

 

committed

 

lawfully

 

clause

 
Government
 
invalid
 

Federal

 

inconsistent

 

decisions

 

courts


erroneous

 

legislative

 

action

 

crimes

 

offenses

 

mitigates

 

subsequent

 
nonetheless
 

directed

 

enactment


Provision
 
cognate
 

future

 

restriction

 

imposed

 

affect

 

private

 
rights
 

adversely

 

legislation


criminal

 
section
 

relates

 
acquired
 

Denial

 

liquors

 
intoxicating
 
making
 

illegal

 

continued


possession

 

Future

 

Privileges

 

denied

 

convicted

 

offense

 
profession
 

practice

 
Offenders
 

embankments