FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059  
1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   >>   >|  
tates, 227 U.S. 308 (1913). [32] Brooks _v._ United States, 267 U.S. 432 (1925). [33] Thornton _v._ United States, 271 U.S. 414 (1926). [34] United States _v._ Ferger, 250 U.S. 199 (1919). [35] Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. _v._ Illinois C.R. Co., 299 U.S. 334 (1937). [36] Everhard's Breweries _v._ Day, 265 U.S. 545 (1924). [37] 296 U.S. 287 (1935). The Civil Rights Act of 1875, which made it a crime for one person to deprive another of equal accommodations at inns, theaters or public conveyances was found to exceed the powers conferred on Congress by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, and hence to be an unlawful invasion of the powers reserved to the States by the Tenth--Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3, 15 (1883). [38] 327 U.S. 92, 102 (1946). [39] United States _v._ California, 297 U.S. 175 (1936). [40] Sanitary District of Chicago _v._ United States, 266 U.S. 405, 425, 426 (1925). [41] Kansas _v._ Colorado, 206 U.S. 46, 87, 89 (1907). [42] _See_ United States _v._ Appalachian Electric Power Co., 311 U.S. 377 (1940). [43] Oklahoma _v._ Atkinson Co., 313 U.S. 508, 534 (1941). [44] Oklahoma _v._ United States Civil Service Commission, 330 U.S. 127, 142-144 (1947). [45] 296 U.S. 315 (1935). [46] 193 U.S. 197 (1904). [47] Ibid. 345, 346. [48] New York _v._ United States, 257 U.S. 591 (1922). [49] Northwestern Electric Co. _v._ Federal Power Commission, 321 U.S. 119 (1944). _See also_ Federal Power Commission _v._ East Ohio Gas Company, 338 U.S. 404 (1950). [50] Helvering _v._ National Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 282 (1938). [51] Helvering _v._ Northwest Steel Mills, 311 U.S. 46 (1940). AMENDMENT 11 SUITS AGAINST STATES Page Purpose and early interpretation 929 Expansion of state immunity 930 Suits against state officials: two categories 930 Mandamus proceedings 932 Early limitation on injunction proceedings 932 Injunction proceedings today: Ex parte Young 933 Tort action against state officials 934 Suits to recover taxes 935 Consent of State to be sued 935 Waiver of immunity 936
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059  
1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

United

 

proceedings

 

Commission

 

immunity

 

powers

 

Helvering

 

Federal

 

Rights

 
officials

Oklahoma

 
Electric
 
Atkinson
 

Appalachian

 
Northwestern
 

Service

 

Injunction

 

injunction

 
limitation
 

Expansion


categories

 

Mandamus

 

Waiver

 
Consent
 
action
 

recover

 

interpretation

 

National

 

Grocery

 

Company


Northwest

 
STATES
 

Purpose

 

AGAINST

 

AMENDMENT

 

Breweries

 

Everhard

 

person

 
deprive
 

Thornton


Brooks
 
Kentucky
 

Collar

 

Illinois

 

Ferger

 

accommodations

 

Sanitary

 
California
 

District

 
Chicago