FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  
, n. i). See also Nichols' _Literary Anecdotes_, vol. iii. p. 287. The 'case' is the frame containing boxes for holding type. X. _A letter about suppressions in 'Taxation no Tyranny! dated March 1, 1775_.[In the possession of Mr. Frank T. Sabin, 10 & 12, Garrick Street Covent Garden.] 'SIR, 'I am sorry to see that all the alterations proposed are evidences of timidity. You may be sure that I do [? not] wish to publish, what those for whom I write do not like to have published. But print me half a dozen copies in the original state, and lay them up for me. It concludes well enough as it is. 'When you print it, if you print it, please to frank one to me here, and frank another to Mrs. Aston at Stow Hill, Lichfield. 'The changes are not for the better, except where facts were mistaken. The last paragraph was indeed rather contemptuous, there was once more of it which I put out myself. 'I am Sir, Your humble Servant, 'SAM. JOHNSON.' 'March 1, 1775.' This letter refers to _Taxation no Tyranny_, which was published before March 31, 1775, the date of Boswell's arrival in London (_ante_, ii. 311). Boswell says that he had in his possession 'a few proof leaves of it marked with corrections in Johnson's own hand-writing' (ib. p. 313). Johnson, he says,' owned to me that it had been revised and curtailed by some of those who were then in power.' When Johnson writes 'when you print it, if you print it,' he uses, doubtless, _print_ in the sense of _striking off copies_. The pamphlet was, we may assume, in type before it was revised by 'those in power.' The corrections had been made in the proof-sheets. Johnson asks to have six copies laid by for him in the state in which he had wished to publish it. It seems that the last paragraph had been struck out by the reviser, for Johnson says 'it was rather contemptuous.' He does not think it needful to supply anything in its place, for he says 'it concludes well enough as it is.' Mr. Strahan had the right, as a member of Parliament, to frank all letters and packets. That is to say, by merely writing his signature on the cover he could pass them through the post free of charge. Johnson, when he wrote to Scotland, used to employ him to frank his letters, 'that he might have the consequence of appearing a parliament-man among his countrymen' (_ante_, iii. 364). It was to Oxford that a copy of the pamphlet was to be franked to Johnson. That he was there at the time
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Johnson

 
copies
 

publish

 

published

 

concludes

 

revised

 

writing

 

corrections

 
letters
 

pamphlet


paragraph

 

contemptuous

 

Boswell

 

Tyranny

 

Taxation

 
possession
 

letter

 

sheets

 
reviser
 

assume


struck

 

wished

 

writes

 

curtailed

 
Anecdotes
 

doubtless

 

Nichols

 

Literary

 

striking

 

needful


Scotland

 

employ

 
charge
 
consequence
 

appearing

 

Oxford

 

franked

 

countrymen

 

parliament

 

Strahan


supply

 
member
 

Parliament

 

signature

 

packets

 

Garrick

 

Garden

 

Covent

 
Street
 
Lichfield