14] Tang, the Governor of Canton, himself dealt largely in opium. See
_Nemesis_, pp. 84, 113.
[15] A guild of Chinese traders at Canton.
[16] Lord Macartney placidly allowed his interpreter to style him "this
red-bristled barbarian tribute-bearer."
[17] Don Sinibaldo says (p. 8) that opium not being expressly mentioned,
"fait partie des articles non specifies, qui sont tenus de payer un droit
d'entree de cinq pour cent"; but surely this is a mistake.
[18] We can well believe with Capt. Hall that "whatever part the question
arising out of the opium trade may have afterwards borne in the
complication of difficulties, there is little doubt that the first germ of
them all was developed at the moment when the general trade with China
became free."--_Nemesis_, p. 79.
[19] Sir J. Davis, Dec. 21, 1855.
[20] L650,000.
[21] Mr. Lay, in a memorandum dated April 1844, gave it as his opinion
that the difficulty of admitting opium rested only in the thought that it
would be a violation of decorum for His Imperial Majesty to legalize a
thing once so strongly condemned. He therefore advocated a change of name.
[22] Sir G. Bonham, April 10, 1851.
[23] Tael = 6s. 8d.
[24] The French took part in the expedition in order to obtain
satisfaction for the murder of a missionary in 1856, so that in their case
it was strictly a missionary war.
[25] New Kwang, Tangchow, Taiwan (Formosa), Swatow, and Kungchow (Hainan).
[26] Mr. Lay, secretary to Lord Elgin's mission.
[27] Lord Elgin had been instructed by Lord Clarendon to ascertain whether
the Chinese Government would revoke its prohibitions on opium. "Whether,"
says Lord Clarendon, "the legalization would tend to augment the trade may
be doubtful, as it seems now to be carried to the full extent of the
demand in China with the sanction and connivance of the local
authorities."
[28] It was currently reported in North China that this officer received
2,000 taels from English merchants for memorializing the Emperor. The
edict _did_ benefit the foreign trade at first.
[29] Sir Rutherford Alcock, _Nineteenth Century_, Dec. 1881, p. 861.
[30] From sixteen taels at Chinkiang to eighty-four taels at Foochow and
Amoy.
[31] Ichang, Wenchow, Wuhu, and Pakhoi.
[32] Sept. 13, 1876.
[33] Dr. Moore, _The Other Side of the Opium Question_, p. 85.
[34] Sir Rutherford Alcock, _Journal of Society of Arts_, p. 220, b.
[35] Dr. Moore (p. 84) quotes Mr. Gardner's opinion
|