FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187  
188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   >>   >|  
201/2 " _d y_ (general slope, exclusive of inequalities) 353/4 " _a x_ (ditto, ditto, to point of cliff above _x_) 231/2 ] For instance, no mountain in the Alps produces a more vigorous impression of peakedness than the Matterhorn. In Professor Forbes's work on the Alps, it is spoken of as an "obelisk" of rock, and represented with little exaggeration in his seventh plate under the outline Fig. 31. Naturally, in glancing, whether at the plate or the mountain, we assume the mass to be a peak, and suppose the line _a b_ to be the steep slope of its side. But that line is a perspective line. It is in reality _perfectly horizontal_, corresponding to _e f_ in the penthouse roof, Fig. 30. [Illustration: FIG. 33. Angles with the horizon _x y_. _a f_ 56 deg. _a e_ 123/4 _e b_ (from point to point) 441/2 _b c_ ( ditto, ditto ) 671/4 _c d_ (overhanging) 79 deg. _a x_ (irrespective of irregularities) 56 _a y_ 383/4 ] Sec. 12. I say "perfectly horizontal," meaning, of course, in general tendency. It is more or less irregular and broken, but so nearly horizontal that, after some prolonged examination of the data I have collected about the Matterhorn, I am at this moment in doubt _which is its top_. For as, in order to examine the beds on its flanks, I walked up the Zmutt glacier, I saw that the line _a b_ in Fig. 31 gradually lost its steepness; and about half-way up the glacier, the conjectural summit _a_ then bearing nearly S. E. (forty degrees east of south), I found the contour was as in Fig. 32. In Fig. 33, I have given the contour as seen from Zermatt; and in all three, the same letters indicate the same points. In the Figures 32 and 33 I measured the angles with the greatest care,[61] from the base lines _x y_, which are accurately horizontal; and their general truth, irrespective of mere ruggedness, may be depended upon. Now in this flank view, Fig. 32, what _was_ the summit at Zermatt, _a_, becomes quite subordinate, and the point _b_, far down the flank in Forbes's view taken from the Riffelhorn, is here the apparent summit. I was for some time in considerable doubt which of the appearances was most trustworthy; and believe now that they are _both_ deceptive;
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187  
188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

horizontal

 

general

 

summit

 

contour

 

irrespective

 

glacier

 
Zermatt
 

perfectly

 

Forbes

 

Matterhorn


mountain
 

bearing

 

considerable

 

degrees

 

appearances

 

walked

 

deceptive

 

flanks

 
steepness
 

trustworthy


gradually

 
conjectural
 

examine

 

accurately

 

depended

 
ruggedness
 

greatest

 
angles
 

Riffelhorn

 

apparent


letters

 

measured

 

subordinate

 

Figures

 

points

 

seventh

 

exaggeration

 
obelisk
 

represented

 

outline


Naturally
 
suppose
 

assume

 
glancing
 
spoken
 
instance
 

exclusive

 

inequalities

 

produces

 

Professor