FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92  
93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>   >|  
himself to be certified, by a Letter from a Learned Friend of his that observed it, _Fons abest hinc, &c._ The Letter is a little too long to be inserted, but the substance is this; That this Well ebbs and flows quite contrary to the flowing and ebbing of the Sea in those parts: for 'tis almost empty at Full Sea, but full at Low water. This may happen from the Channel by which it is supplied, which may come from the bottom of a Sea very remote from those parts, and where the Tides are much differing from those of the approximate shores. A Fourth, lies in _Westmorland_, near the River _Leder_; _Qui instar Euripi saepius in die reciprocantibus undis fluit & refluit_, which ebbs and flows many times a day. This may proceed from its being supplyed from many Channels, coming from several parts of the Sea, lying sufficiently distant asunder to have the times of High-water differing enough one from the other; so as that whensoever it shall be High water over any of those places, where these Channels begin, it shall likewise be so in the Well; but this is but a supposition. A Seventh _Query_ was, Whether the _dissolution_ or mixing of several bodies, whether fluid or solid, with saline or other Liquors, might not partly be attributed to this Principle of the congruity of those bodies and their dissolvents? As of Salt in Water, Metals in several _Menstruums_, Unctuous Gums in Oyls, the mixing of Wine and Water, &c. And whether _precipitation_ be not partly made from the same Principle of Incongruity? I say _partly_, because there are in some Dissolutions, some other Causes concurrent. I shall lastly make a much more seemingly strange and unlikely _Query_; and that is, Whether this Principle, well examined and explained, may not be found a _co-efficient_ in the most considerable Operations of Nature? As in those of _Heat_, and _Light_ consequently of _Rarefaction_ and _Condensation_, _Hardness_, and _Fluidness_, _Perspicuity_ and _Opacousness_, _Refractions_ and _Colours. &c._ Nay, I know not whether there may be many things done in Nature, in which this may not (be said to) have a Finger? This I have in some other passages of this Treatise further enquired into and shewn, that as well _Light_ as _Heat_ may be caused by _corrosion_, which is applicable to _congruity_, and consequently all the rest will be but _subsequents_: In the mean time I would not willingly be guilty of that _Error_, which the thrice Noble and Learned _Ver
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92  
93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Principle

 
partly
 
differing
 

Nature

 
mixing
 
congruity
 
Whether
 

bodies

 

Channels

 

Learned


Letter
 

Incongruity

 

precipitation

 

applicable

 
subsequents
 
thrice
 

Metals

 

dissolvents

 

guilty

 
Unctuous

Dissolutions
 

Menstruums

 

willingly

 

corrosion

 
Finger
 

Condensation

 

Hardness

 
Rarefaction
 

passages

 
Operations

Treatise
 

Opacousness

 

Refractions

 

Colours

 

Perspicuity

 
things
 

Fluidness

 

considerable

 

seemingly

 
strange

lastly

 

concurrent

 

caused

 

efficient

 
explained
 

examined

 

enquired

 
Causes
 

whensoever

 

happen