FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   >>   >|  
hould not, however, be overlooked, that the two main groups of parasites differ from each other, far more than do the two corresponding groups of species to which they are attached; and, on the other hand, that the parasitic males of _S. Peronii_ and _S. villosum_ resemble each other more closely, than do the two hermaphrodite forms;--but it is very difficult to weigh the value of the differences in the different parts of species. Besides these general, there are some closer relations between the parasites and the animals to which they are attached; thus the most conspicuous internal character by which _Ibla quadrivalvis_ is distinguished from _I. Cumingii_, is the length of the caudal appendages and the greater size of the parts of the mouth; in the parasites, we have exactly corresponding differences. Out of the six species of Scalpellum in their ordinary state, _S. ornatum_ is alone quite destitute of spines on the membrane connecting the valves; and had it not been for this circumstance, I should even have used the presence of spines as a generic character; on the other hand, _S. villosum_, in accordance with its specific name, has larger and more conspicuous spines than any other species. In the parasites we have an exactly parallel case; the parasite of _S. ornatum_ being the only one without spines, and the spines on the parasite of _S. villosum_ being much the largest! This latter species is highly singular in having no caudal appendages, and the parasite is destitute of these same organs, though present inn the parasites of _S. rostratum_ and _S. Peronii_. Again, _S. villosum_ approaches, in all its characters, very closely to the genus Pollicipes, and the parasite in having prehensile antennae, with the disc but little pointed, and with spines at the further end, departs from Scalpellum and approaches Pollicipes! Will any one believe that these several parallel differences, between the Cirripedial parasites and the Cirripedes to which they are attached, are accidental, and without signification? yet, this must be admitted, if my view of their male sex and mature be rejected. One more, and the most important special relation between the parasites and the cirripedes to which they are attached, remains to be noticed, namely that of their prehensile larval antennae. I observed the antennae more or less perfectly in the males of all, and except in _S. villosum_, in all the species, though so utterly different in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

parasites

 

species

 
spines
 

villosum

 

attached

 
parasite
 

differences

 

antennae

 

conspicuous

 

approaches


ornatum

 

character

 
destitute
 

appendages

 
caudal
 
Scalpellum
 
Pollicipes
 

prehensile

 

Peronii

 

closely


parallel

 

groups

 
present
 

pointed

 

singular

 

organs

 
characters
 

highly

 

rostratum

 

cirripedes


remains

 

noticed

 

relation

 

special

 

important

 

larval

 

utterly

 
perfectly
 

observed

 

rejected


mature

 

Cirripedial

 
Cirripedes
 
accidental
 

departs

 

signification

 

largest

 
admitted
 

membrane

 

animals