FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>   >|  
m my conviction that giving references to works, in which there is not any original matter, or in which the Plates are not of a high order of excellence, is absolutely injurious to the progress of natural history, and partly, from the impossibility of feeling certain to which species the short descriptions given in most works are applicable;--thus, to take the commonest species, the _Lepas anatifera_, I have not found a single description (with the exception of the anatomical description by M. Martin St. Ange) by which this species can be certainly discriminated from the almost equally common _Lepas Hillii_. I have, however, been fortunate in having been permitted to examine a considerable number of authentically named specimens, (to which I have attached the sign (!) used by botanists,) so that several of my synonyms are certainly correct. [1] In the Rules published by the British Association, the 12th edition, (1766,) is specified, but I am informed by Mr. Strickland that this is an error, and that the binomial method was followed in the 10th edition. The Lepadidae, or pedunculated Cirripedes, have been neglected under a systematic point of view, to a degree which I cannot quite understand: no doubt they are subject to considerable variation, and as long as the internal surfaces of the valves and all the organs of the animal's body, are passed over as unimportant, there will occasionally be some difficulty in the identification of the several forms, and still more in settling the limits of the variability of the species. But I suspect the pedunculated Cirripedes have, in fact, been neglected owing to their close affinity, and the consequent necessity of their being included in the same Work with the Sessile Cirripedes; for these latter will ever present, I am fully convinced, insuperable difficulties in their identification by external characters alone. I will here only further remark, that in the Introduction I have given my reasons for assigning distinct names to the several Valves, and to some parts of the included animal's body; and that in the Introductory Remarks, under the general description of the Lepadidae, I have given an abstract of my Anatomical Observations. CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA. Page 12, twenty lines from bottom, _for_ "hinder pair of true thoracic limbs," _read_ "pair of true thoracic limbs." 42, 43. I should have added, that the number of the segments in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
species
 
description
 
Cirripedes
 
identification
 

edition

 

neglected

 

Lepadidae

 

considerable

 

number

 

included


thoracic

 

pedunculated

 

animal

 

affinity

 

consequent

 

suspect

 

necessity

 
organs
 
passed
 

valves


surfaces

 

variation

 
internal
 

unimportant

 

settling

 

limits

 
occasionally
 

difficulty

 

variability

 
CORRIGENDA

ADDENDA

 
Observations
 

Anatomical

 

Introductory

 
Remarks
 

general

 

abstract

 

twenty

 

segments

 

bottom


hinder

 
Valves
 
convinced
 

insuperable

 

difficulties

 

external

 

present

 

Sessile

 

characters

 
subject