FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  
o you say the cause is in the influence of other planets? Well, suppose, for the sake of the argument, we admit it, are we then through with the problem? No. We have only moved the difficulty one step backward. We can see how one billiard ball may set another in motion, but it is only thinkable upon the supposition that there was an agent behind the ball which put the second ball in motion. What put the first ball in motion? Did it put itself in motion? No. The law is this: A body must remain forever at rest without some external agency to put it in motion. Now, you step out from our planet to its nearest neighbor, and from thence to the next, and so on till you get to the furthest limits of matter--carry along with you the idea that one planet has put another in motion until you arrive at the last one thinkable, and then ask yourself this question: Is inertia a property of matter here? Is the law of motion, already quoted, a law of motion here? If it is, then, of necessity, science demands an agent outside of planets, or behind the whole of them, to put them in motion, and to control them while in motion in order to carry them forward in _circles_--do you see? "But the fool says in his heart there is no God." THE INCONSISTENCY OF MODERN UNBELIEVERS OR MATERIALISTS. The materialistic unbeliever is necessarily bound up in a contradiction from which there is no escape short of a denial of the eternity of matter, space and duration, on the one hand, or a denial of the materialistic philosophy, upon the other. His reasoning is this: Space exists. I know it exists. I can't set bounds to space, therefore it is infinite. Matter exists. I know it exists. I can't annihilate matter, therefore matter is eternal. Duration is. I know it is. I can't set limits to it; therefore duration is infinite. Now, it is easy to discover that the conclusion in each case rests upon two thoughts. First, Conscious knowledge expressed in the phrase "I know." Secondly, Want of power to set bounds to space, to limit duration and annihilate matter. The other and contrary side is brought up in the following arrangement: Mind exists. I know it exists. I can't set limits to mind; therefore mind is infinite, mind is eternal. Life exists. I can't comprehend or set limits to life; therefore life is infinite, life is eternal. The time was when there was no life or mind associated with or in matter, the matter belonging to our pla
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  



Top keywords:
motion
 

matter

 

exists

 

limits

 
infinite
 
eternal
 

duration

 
materialistic
 

planet

 

bounds


annihilate

 

planets

 
thinkable
 

denial

 
contradiction
 
Secondly
 

eternity

 

escape

 
unbeliever
 

belonging


INCONSISTENCY

 

MATERIALISTS

 

necessarily

 
UNBELIEVERS
 

MODERN

 
arrangement
 

thoughts

 

knowledge

 

expressed

 

Conscious


contrary

 

conclusion

 
discover
 

reasoning

 

comprehend

 

philosophy

 
Duration
 
Matter
 

brought

 

phrase


arrive

 

supposition

 

billiard

 

forever

 
remain
 

backward

 
suppose
 

influence

 
argument
 

difficulty