FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59  
60   61   62   63   64   >>  
north."--Verstegan's _Restitution of Antiquities_, A.D. 1605. Many of your accomplished philological readers will doubtless consider the information of this Note trivial and puerile; but they will, I hope, bear with a tyro in the science, in recording an original remark of his own, borne out by an authority so decisive as Verstegan. A. B. R. * * * * * PICTURES BY HOGARTH. (Vol. vii., pp. 339. 412.) In reply to AMATEUR, I can inform him that at the sale of the Marlborough effects at Marlborough House about thirty years ago, there were sold four or five small whole-lengths in oil of members of that family. They were hardly clever enough for what Hogarth's after-style would lead us to expect, but there were many reasons for thinking they were by him. They came into the possession of Mr. Croker, who presented them, as family curiosities, to the second Earl Spencer, and they are now, I presume, in the gallery at Althorpe. One of them was peculiarly curious as connected with a remarkable anecdote of the great Duchess. Horace Walpole tells us in the _Reminiscences_, her granddaughter, Lady Bateman, having persuaded her brother, the young Duke of Marlborough, to marry a Miss Trevor without the Duchess's consent: "The grandam's rage exceeded all bounds. Having a portrait of Lady Bateman, she blackened the face, and then wrote on it, '_Now her outside's as black as her inside._'" One of the portraits I speak of was of Lady Bateman, and bore on its face evidence of having incurred some damage, for the coat of arms with which (like all the others, and as was Hogarth's fashion) it was ornamented in one corner, were angrily scratched out, as with a knife. Whether this defacement gave rise to Walpole's story, or whether the face had been also blackened with some stuff that was afterwards removed, seems doubtful; the picture itself, according to my recollection, showed no mark but the armorial defacement. I much wonder this style of small whole-lengths has not been more prevalent; they give the general air and manner of the personage so much better than the bust size can do, and they are so much more suited to the size of our ordinary apartments. C. Referring to AN AMATEUR'S inquiry as to where any pictures painted by Hogarth are to be seen, I beg to say that I have in my possession, and should be happy to show him, the portrait of Hogarth's wife (Sir William T
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59  
60   61   62   63   64   >>  



Top keywords:
Hogarth
 

Marlborough

 

Bateman

 

blackened

 

AMATEUR

 
portrait
 
Duchess
 

Walpole

 

lengths

 

defacement


family

 
possession
 

Verstegan

 

damage

 

incurred

 

evidence

 

corner

 

angrily

 

ornamented

 

pictures


fashion
 

painted

 

William

 
bounds
 
Having
 
inside
 
scratched
 

portraits

 

Whether

 

showed


recollection

 
exceeded
 

picture

 

armorial

 

general

 
personage
 

manner

 

doubtful

 

suited

 
inquiry

prevalent

 

Referring

 

removed

 
ordinary
 

apartments

 

connected

 

HOGARTH

 

PICTURES

 

authority

 
decisive