FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>  
on the subject of Personality, it will be apparent that the theory of Monism is in conflict with that of Theism only in so far as personality appears to imply limitation. This is a point which I have previously considered in these pages (Chapter iv, p. 109), with the result of appearing to show that the conflict is one which would probably vanish could we rise above the necessary limitations of human thought. Therefore, it here seems worth while to ask, What can be said by the philosophical theory of Monism to the old theological dilemma touching free-will and predestination? Or, even apart from any question of Theism, what position does Monism suppose the psychical activity of man to hold in relation to that of the universe? Of course the latter statement of the question is included in the former; and, therefore, we may present it thus;--If the human will is free, and the theory of Theism substantially true, how are we to reconcile the fact with the theory? According to the theory of Theism as sanctioned by Monism, what we apprehend as natural causation is the obverse of a part of a _summum genus_--i.e. the part falling within human observation whose whole is the Absolute Volition. This Volition, being absolute, can nowhere meet with restraint; it is therefore absolutely free, and can never contradict itself. Thus, those circumscribed portions of it which we know as human minds--and which, on account of being so circumscribed, are free within themselves--do not in their freedom conflict with the Absolute Volition. The Absolute Volition and the Relative Volition are always in unison. It is not that the Absolute Volition unconditionally determines the Relative Volition--else the Relative Volition would not be free; but it is that the Absolute Volition invariably assents to the Relative Volition as to the activity of an integral part of itself. This will be at once evident if we consider that our only idea of determination--i.e. causation--is, upon the theistic theory, derived from our observing the consistency of the Divine Will, whether as revealed subjectively in the causal operations of our own minds, or objectively in the causal operations of Nature. Therefore, the idea of causation as between the Absolute Volition and the Relative Volition is an idea destitute of meaning. One Relative Volition may act causally on another. Relative Volition, because each is wholly external to each. But all Relative Volitions are co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>  



Top keywords:

Volition

 

Relative

 

Absolute

 

theory

 

Monism

 

Theism

 
causation
 

conflict

 

Therefore

 

circumscribed


operations
 

question

 

activity

 

causal

 

unison

 

freedom

 

account

 

Volitions

 
absolute
 

observation


portions

 
contradict
 

restraint

 

absolutely

 

revealed

 
subjectively
 

Divine

 
derived
 

observing

 

consistency


causally

 

meaning

 

destitute

 

objectively

 

Nature

 

theistic

 

external

 
invariably
 

assents

 

unconditionally


determines
 
integral
 

determination

 
evident
 
wholly
 
present
 

vanish

 

appearing

 

limitations

 

thought