FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   >>   >|  
| | | |First cousins, | _fa bro son_ | 265 | _fa bro da_ | 302 | | male and | _fa si son_ | 184 | _fa si da_ | 208 | | female | _me bro son_ | 236 | _me bro da_ | 266 | | | _me si son_ | 237 | _me si da_ | 246 | |_______________|_______________|___________|______________|___________| It may seem at first sight surprising that a brother and a sister should each have the same average number of brothers. It puzzled me until I had thought the matter out, and when the results were published in "Nature," it also seems to have puzzled an able mathematician, and gave rise to some newspaper controversy, which need not be recapitulated. The essence of the problem is that the sex of one child is supposed to give no clue of any practical importance to that of any other child in the same family. Therefore, if one child be selected out of a family of brothers and sisters, the proportion of males to females in those that remain will be, _on the average_, identical with that of males to females in the population at large. It makes no difference whether the selected child be a boy or a girl. Of course, if the conditions were "given a family of three boys and three girls," each boy would have only two brothers and three sisters, and each girl would have three brothers and two sisters, but that is not the problem. Subject to this explanation, the general accuracy of the observed figures which attest the truth of the above conclusion cannot be gainsaid on theoretical grounds, nor can the conclusions be ignored to which they lead. They enable us to make calculations concerning the average number of kinsfolk in each and every specified degree in a stationary population, or, if desired, in one that increases or decreases at a specified rate. It will here be supposed for convenience that the average number of males and females are equal, but any other proportion may be substituted. The calculations only regard its fertile members; they show that every person has, on the average, about one male fertile relative in each and every form of specific kinship. Kinsfolk may be divided into direct ancestry, collaterals of all kinds, and direct descendants. As regards the direct ancestry, each person has one and only one ancestor in each specific degree, one _fa_, one _fa fa_, one _me fa_, and so on, although in each _generic_ degree it i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

average

 

brothers

 

number

 

sisters

 

family

 

degree

 
females
 

direct

 

proportion

 
ancestry

selected

 

calculations

 

supposed

 

problem

 
population
 

fertile

 
person
 

specific

 

puzzled

 

theoretical


figures
 

attest

 

grounds

 

enable

 

gainsaid

 
conclusions
 

conclusion

 

collaterals

 

divided

 

Kinsfolk


kinship

 

descendants

 

generic

 

ancestor

 

relative

 
decreases
 

increases

 
desired
 

kinsfolk

 

stationary


observed

 
convenience
 

members

 

regard

 

substituted

 

thought

 
matter
 

sister

 
results
 
published