FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  
This witness, who was but a child when the incident had occurred, clearly recalled the fact that Ebbe Petersen had not decided to take his wife and daughter with him on the voyage until a few days before they sailed. They had then invited her, the witness--now a Mrs. Cantwell--to go with them, but her mother had declined to allow her to do so. Mrs. Petersen, moreover, according to Mrs. Cantwell, was a woman of education, who wrote a particularly fine hand. Other papers were discovered executed at about the same time, signed by Mrs. Petersen with her full name. It seemed inconceivable that she should have signed any deed, much less one of so much importance, with her _mark_, and, moreover, that she should have executed any such deed at all when her husband was on the spot to convey his own property. But the strangest fact of all was that the attesting witness to this extraordinary instrument was H. Huffman Browne! It also appeared to have been recorded _at his instance_ eleven years after its execution. In the meantime, however, that is to say, between the sinking of the _Geiser_ in '88 and the recording of Mary Petersen's supposed deed in '99, another _equally mysterious_ deed to the same property had been filed. This document, executed and recorded in 1896, purported to convey part of the Petersen property to a man named John J. Keilly, and was signed by a person calling himself Charles A. Clark. By a later deed, executed and signed a few days later, John J. Keilly appeared to have conveyed the same property to Ignatius F. X. O'Rourke, the very person to whom Mrs. Petersen had apparently executed her deed in 1888. And H. Huffman Browne was the attesting witness to both these deeds! A glance at the following diagram will serve to clear up any confusion which may exist in the mind of the reader: [Sidenote: (Not Recorded until 1899)] 1888 MARY A. PETERSEN 1896 CHARLES A. CLARK by her (X) deed conveys _same property_ conveys to to I.F.X. O'ROURKE JOHN J. KEILLY. | | 1896 JOHN J. KEILLY | conveys to | I.F.X. O'ROURKE |_________________________| O'ROURKE thus holds land through two sources. Browne was the witness to both these parallel transactions! Of course it was simple enough to see what had occurred. In 1896 a mysterious man, named Clark, without vestige of right or title, so far as t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Petersen
 

executed

 

property

 

witness

 

signed

 
Browne
 
ROURKE
 

conveys

 
convey
 

attesting


KEILLY

 

person

 
Keilly
 

recorded

 
appeared
 

Huffman

 
mysterious
 
Cantwell
 

occurred

 

diagram


glance

 

incident

 

reader

 

Sidenote

 

confusion

 

conveyed

 

Ignatius

 

decided

 

Charles

 

apparently


recalled

 
Rourke
 

Recorded

 

simple

 

transactions

 
vestige
 

parallel

 
sources
 

CHARLES

 
PETERSEN

discovered
 

calling

 
extraordinary
 
strangest
 

instrument

 

sailed

 
instance
 

invited

 
inconceivable
 

declined