FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909  
910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   >>   >|  
the highest, and most important, in my opinion, ever likely to come before it. That question is, _whether, in the eye of equitable jurisprudence, this devise be a charity at all_. I deny that it is so. I maintain, that neither by judicial decisions nor by correct reasoning on general principles can this devise or bequest be regarded as a charity. This part of the argument is not affected by the particular judicial system of Pennsylvania, or the question of the power of her courts to uphold and administer charitable gifts. The question which I now propose respects the inherent, essential, and manifest character of the devise itself. In this respect, I wish to express myself clearly, and to be correctly and distinctly understood. What I have said I shall stand by, and endeavor to maintain; namely, that in the view of a court of equity this devise _is no charity at all_. It is no charity, because the plan of education proposed by Mr. Girard is derogatory to the Christian religion; tends to weaken men's reverence for that religion, and their conviction of its authority and importance; and therefore, in its general character, tends to mischievous, and not to useful ends. The proposed school is to be founded on plain and clear principles, and for plain and clear objects, of infidelity. This cannot well be doubted; and a gift, or devise, for such objects, is not a charity, and as such entitled to the well-known favor with which charities are received and upheld by the courts of Christian countries. In the next place, the object of this bequest is against the public policy of the State of Pennsylvania, in which State Christianity is declared to be the law of the land. For that reason, therefore, as well as the other, the devise ought not to be allowed to take effect. These are the two propositions which it is my purpose to maintain, on this part of the case. This scheme of instruction begins by attempting to attach reproach and odium to the whole clergy of the country. It places a brand, a stigma, on every individual member of the profession, without an exception. No minister of the Gospel, of any denomination, is to be allowed to come within the grounds belonging to this school, on any occasion, or for any purpose whatever. They are all rigorously excluded, as if their mere presence might cause pestilence. We have heard it said that Mr. Girard, by this will, distributed his charity without distinction of sect or party
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909  
910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

charity

 

devise

 

question

 

maintain

 
objects
 
purpose
 

character

 

courts

 

Pennsylvania

 

allowed


Christian

 

proposed

 

Girard

 

school

 

religion

 

principles

 

general

 
bequest
 

judicial

 

important


effect
 
propositions
 

scheme

 

reproach

 

attach

 

attempting

 

instruction

 
begins
 

object

 

public


received

 
upheld
 

countries

 
policy
 

opinion

 

reason

 
clergy
 
Christianity
 

declared

 

presence


excluded

 

rigorously

 

pestilence

 

distinction

 

distributed

 

occasion

 
belonging
 

member

 
profession
 

individual