FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  
?[7] _Both_. Wee'l wait vpon you. _Ham_. No such matter.[8] I will not sort you with the rest of my seruants: for to speake to you like an honest man: I am most dreadfully attended;[9] but in the beaten way of friendship,[10] [Sidenote: But in] What make you at _Elsonower_? [Footnote 1: 'it is not true that the world is grown honest': he doubts themselves. His eye is sharper because his heart is sorer since he left Wittenberg. He proceeds to examine them.] [Footnote 2: This passage, beginning with 'Let me question,' and ending with 'dreadfully attended,' is not in the _Quarto_. Who inserted in the Folio this and other passages? Was it or was it not Shakspere? Beyond a doubt they are Shakspere's all. Then who omitted those omitted? Was Shakspere incapable of refusing any of his own work? Or would these editors, who profess to have all opportunity, and who, belonging to the theatre, must have had the best of opportunities, have desired or dared to omit what far more painstaking editors have since presumed, though out of reverence, to restore?] [Footnote 3: 'but it is thinking that makes it so:'] [Footnote 4: --feeling after the cause of Hamlet's strangeness, and following the readiest suggestion, that of chagrin at missing the succession.] [Footnote 5: objects and aims.] [Footnote 6: _foi_.] [Footnote 7: Does he choose beggars as the representatives of substance because they lack ambition--that being shadow? Or does he take them as the shadows of humanity, that, following Rosincrance, he may get their shadows, the shadows therefore of shadows, to parallel _monarchs_ and _heroes_? But he is not satisfied with his own analogue--therefore will to the court, where good logic is not wanted--where indeed he knows a hellish lack of reason.] [Footnote 8: 'On no account.'] [Footnote 9: 'I have very bad servants.' Perhaps he judges his servants spies upon him. Or might he mean that he was _haunted with bad thoughts_? Or again, is it a stroke of his pretence of madness--suggesting imaginary followers?] [Footnote: 10: 'to speak plainly, as old friends.'] [Page 92] _Rosin_. To visit you my Lord, no other occasion. _Ham_. Begger that I am, I am euen poore in [Sidenote: am ever poore] thankes; but I thanke you: and sure deare friends my thanks are too deare a halfepeny[1]; were you [Sidenote: 72] not sent for? Is it your owne inclining? Is it a free visitation?[2] Come, deale iust
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

shadows

 
Sidenote
 

Shakspere

 
editors
 

friends

 

servants

 

honest

 

attended

 

omitted


dreadfully

 
wanted
 

hellish

 

reason

 
account
 
Rosincrance
 
ambition
 

substance

 

shadow

 
representatives

choose
 

beggars

 

objects

 

heroes

 
monarchs
 
satisfied
 

analogue

 

parallel

 

humanity

 

madness


thanke
 

thankes

 

occasion

 

Begger

 

halfepeny

 

visitation

 

inclining

 

haunted

 

thoughts

 
Perhaps

judges

 
stroke
 
pretence
 

plainly

 

succession

 
suggesting
 

imaginary

 
followers
 

opportunities

 
Wittenberg