FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552  
553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   >>   >|  
the commission of the Sieur de la Roche, 1598, in which he is empowered to make grants in the form of fiefs, seigniories, etc., to persons of merit. Up to 1627, when the Company of New France (or the Company of One Hundred Associates) was chartered, only three seigniories had been granted, two to colonial laymen and the third to the Jesuit Order. Thereafter a large number of seigniorial grants were made--no less than sixty between 1632 and 1663, when the Company surrendered its rights to the crown. Details as to the later history of Seigniorial Tenure in Canada, how it was applied to the land, and why it outlived the same system in Old France, will be found in the works cited below. The system was abolished in Canada in 1854. =Index=: =F= In New France, 56. =L= Beginning of, 119. =Dr= Described, 11; an obstacle to the transfer of land, 256; notaries favourable to, 257. =E= Failure of La Fontaine-Baldwin ministry to settle question, 101-102; measure passed by Assembly, but defeated in Legislative Council, 119-120; settlement postponed by Hincks-Morin government in 1853, 126; Cauchon offers amendment to address, expressing regret at failure to settle question, 126-127; MacNab-Morin ministry pledged to settlement, 140; measure passed in 1854, 142; history of question, 171-188; originates in old feudal system, 171-174; introduced into Canada by Richelieu, 175; description of system, 175-184; movement for its abolition, 185-186; judicial investigation by a commission, 186-187; terms of settlement, 187-188. =S= Not satisfactory to English settlers, 1, 6. =BL= Commission appointed (1841) to consider question of abolishing it, 99; pressing for settlement, 339; weakens Reform party in Lower Canada, 349; history of, 349-351; court for adjustment of claims, presided over by La Fontaine, 358. =C= John A. Macdonald votes against settlement of, 32; Cartier works for, 32-115; the system described, 35-37. =Md= A problem in Quebec, 14; abolition of, demanded in Quebec, 62; dealt with by MacNab-Morin ministry, 63; its abolition effected, 66-68. =Bib.=: Munro, _Seigniorial System in Canada_ and _Documents Relating to Seigniorial Tenure_; Munro, _Droit de Banalite_; _Pieces et Documents Relatifs a la Tenure Seigneuriale_; _Lower Canada Reports_; _Seigniorial Questions_; Dent, _Last Forty Years_. On the history of individual seigniories, _see_ Lalande, _Une Vielle Seignieurie: Boucherville_; _Mingan Seigniory: Documents in Appeal to Privy Co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552  
553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Canada

 

system

 

settlement

 

question

 

Seigniorial

 

history

 

France

 
ministry
 

Documents

 

Tenure


Company

 

seigniories

 
abolition
 
Quebec
 
MacNab
 
Fontaine
 

measure

 

settle

 

passed

 

commission


grants

 

individual

 

satisfactory

 
Commission
 

appointed

 
English
 
settlers
 

Lalande

 

Richelieu

 

Seigniory


Mingan

 

description

 

introduced

 
feudal
 

Boucherville

 

abolishing

 
judicial
 

investigation

 

Vielle

 
Appeal

movement
 

Seignieurie

 

originates

 

Cartier

 

Relating

 

System

 

effected

 

demanded

 

problem

 

Macdonald