FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981  
982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   >>   >|  
twice the hearing was postponed to accommodate the opposition. The second time, as no one appeared against the resolution, it was again reported favorably. Just after this had been done Mr. Parker appeared and objected, and the chairman agreed to recall it and give the opposition one more chance. On April 10, the time appointed for the hearing, Bishop Doane sent a letter declining the honor of appearing, but a delegation from New York City came up, and Mrs. Francis M. Scott and Prof. Monroe Smith of Columbia University addressed the committee opposing the measure. Mrs. Almy and Mrs. Mary H. Hunt replied in its behalf. For the third time the resolution was reported favorably by the Senate Committee, and April 18 the vote was taken. Senators Pound, Coggeshall and Bradley spoke in favor, and Jacob H. Cantor in opposition. It was carried by 20 ayes, 5 noes. When the resolution went to the Revision Committee it was found that in one section there was a period where there should have been a comma. Mrs. Almy was obliged to remain two weeks and get an amendment through both Houses to correct this error. Finally the resolution was declared perfect, and was ordered published throughout the State, etc. Then it was discovered that the word "resident" was used instead of "citizen," and the entire work of the winter was void. As it is not required that copies of original bills shall be preserved, the responsibility for the mistake never can be located. The Senate of 1896, by a change in the term of office, was to sit three years instead of two; and a concurrent resolution, in order to pass two successive Legislatures, would have to be deferred still another year, so no work was attempted. On Jan. 4, 1897, when the Legislature assembled, every member found on his desk a personally addressed letter appealing for the right of women citizens to representation, signed by all the officers of the State Suffrage Association and by the presidents of all the local societies. The resolution asking for a suffrage amendment was introduced in the Senate by Joseph Mullen, in the Assembly by W. W. Armstrong, and was referred to the Judiciary Committees. Repeated interviews by Mrs. Mariana W. Chapman, Mrs. Mary E. Craigie, chairman of the legislative committee, and other members were not sufficient to secure a favorable vote even from the committees, as they were frightened by the action of the preceding Legislature. The New York Society Opp
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981  
982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
resolution
 

Senate

 

opposition

 

amendment

 

letter

 

addressed

 

Committee

 
Legislature
 

committee

 
favorably

chairman

 

appeared

 

reported

 

hearing

 

winter

 
deferred
 

Legislatures

 
attempted
 

change

 

assembled


located

 
responsibility
 

mistake

 

original

 

preserved

 

successive

 

copies

 
concurrent
 

office

 

required


signed
 

Chapman

 
Craigie
 

legislative

 

Mariana

 

interviews

 

referred

 

Judiciary

 

Committees

 

Repeated


members

 

sufficient

 

action

 
preceding
 
Society
 

frightened

 
secure
 

favorable

 

committees

 

Armstrong