FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794  
795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   >>   >|  
eparate ballot-boxes necessary and in many places these were not provided, so there was considerable misunderstanding and confusion. On election day a wind storm of unusual violence, even for that section of the country, raged all day. Through the influence of the Liquor Dealers' Association, which had used every possible effort to defeat the suffrage bill, reporters were sent by a number of large papers in different cities, especially St. Louis, with orders to ridicule the voting of the women and minimize its effects. As a result the Eastern press was soon flooded with sensational and false reports. An official and carefully prepared report of 112 pages was issued by Judge Francis G. Adams, secretary of the Kansas State Historical Association, and Prof. William H. Carruth of the State University, giving the official returns from 253 cities. The total vote was 105,216; vote of men, 76,629; of women, 28,587. In a few of the very small cities there were no women's votes. In many of the second-class cities more than one-half as many women as men voted. In Leavenworth, 3,967 ballots were cast by men, and 2,467 by women; in Lawrence, 1,437 by men, 1,050 by women. In Kansas City, Topeka and Fort Scott about one-fourth as many women as men voted. In these estimates it must be taken into consideration that there were many more men than women in the State. In 1890, three years later, the census report showed the excess of males to be about 100,000. The pamphlet referred to contained 100 pages of extracts from the press of Kansas on the voting of women, and stated that these represented but a fraction of the comment. They varied as much as the individual opinions of men, some welcoming the new voters, some ridiculing and abusing, others referring to the movement as a foolish fad which would soon be dropped. The Republican and Prohibitionist papers almost universally paid the highest tribute to the influence of women on the election and assured them of every possible support in the future. The Democratic papers, with but few exceptions, scoffed at them and condemned woman suffrage. The immense majority of opinion was in favor of the new regime and was an unimpeachable answer to the objections and misrepresentations which found place in the press of all other parts of the country. The interest of Kansas women in their political rights never has abated. The proportion of their vote varies in about the same ratio as that of me
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794  
795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Kansas

 

cities

 

papers

 
Association
 

suffrage

 
report
 

official

 

election

 

country

 
influence

voting

 

varied

 

individual

 

opinions

 

comment

 

represented

 

fraction

 
stated
 
excess
 
consideration

fourth

 

estimates

 
pamphlet
 

referred

 

contained

 

welcoming

 

census

 
showed
 

extracts

 

objections


answer

 

misrepresentations

 

unimpeachable

 

majority

 

opinion

 

regime

 

varies

 
proportion
 

abated

 
interest

political

 

rights

 

immense

 

dropped

 

Republican

 

Prohibitionist

 

foolish

 

movement

 

ridiculing

 

abusing