FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166  
1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   >>  
t, title "Baron aud Feme," B. 9_. "_The wife is only the servant of her husband._"--_Baron Alderson_ (_Wharton's Laws relating to the Women of England_), _p. 168_. "It is probably not generally known, that whenever a woman has accepted an offer of marriage, all she has, or expects to have, becomes virtually the property of the man thus accepted as a husband; and no gift or deed executed by her between the period of acceptance and the marriage is held to be valid; for were she permitted to give away or otherwise settle her property, he might be disappointed in the wealth he looked to in making the offer."--_Roper, Law of Husband and Wife, Book I., ch. xiii_. "A lady whose husband had been unsuccessful in business, established herself as a milliner in Manchester. After some years of toil, she realized sufficient for the family to live upon comfortably, the husband having done nothing meanwhile. They lived for a time in easy circumstances, after she gave up business, and then the husband died, _bequeathing all his wife's earnings to his own illegitimate children_. At the age of sixty-two, she was compelled, in order to gain her bread, to return to business."--_Westminster Review, Oct., 1856_. MR. JUSTICE COLERIDGE'S JUDGMENT "_in re Cochrane_."--The facts were briefly these. A writ of _habeas corpus_ had been granted to the wife, who, having been brought into the power of the husband by strategem, had since that time been kept in confinement by him. By the return to the writ, it appeared that the parties had lived together for about three years after their marriage on terms of apparent affection, and had two children; that in May, 1836, Mrs. Cochrane withdrew herself and offspring from his house and protection, and had resided away from him against his will, for nearly four years. While absent from her husband, Mrs. Cochrane had always resided with her mother, nor was there the slightest imputation on her honor. In ordering her to be restored to her husband, the learned judge, after stating the question to be whether by the common law, the husband, in order to prevent his wife from eloping, _has a right to confine her in his own dwelling-house, and restrain her from liberty for an indefinite time_, using no cruelty nor imposing any hardship or unnecessary restraint on his part, and on hers there being no reason from her past conduct to apprehend that she will avail herself of her absence from his control to injur
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166  
1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   >>  



Top keywords:

husband

 

marriage

 

Cochrane

 

business

 
children
 
resided
 

return

 

property

 

accepted

 

affection


apparent
 

protection

 
withdrew
 
offspring
 

appeared

 
granted
 

brought

 

corpus

 
habeas
 
briefly

strategem

 

parties

 
confinement
 

hardship

 
unnecessary
 
restraint
 

imposing

 
cruelty
 
restrain
 

liberty


indefinite
 
absence
 

control

 

apprehend

 

conduct

 

reason

 

dwelling

 

confine

 

imputation

 

ordering


slightest
 

generally

 

mother

 
restored
 
learned
 

prevent

 

eloping

 

common

 

stating

 
question