FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897  
898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   >>   >|  
members of a church that the women members have a right to change their creed. All that is settled; nobody contests it. If a man stood up here and said, "I am a Calvinist, and therefore my wife is bound to be one," you would send him to a lunatic asylum. You would say, "Poor man! don't judge him by what he says; he don't mean it." But law is halting back just where that old civilization was; we want to change it. We are not doing anything new. There is no fanaticism about it. We are merely extending the area of liberty--nothing else. We have made great progress. The law passed at the last session of the New York Legislature grants, in fact, the whole question. The moment you grant us anything, we have gained the whole. You can not stop with an inconsistent statute-book. A man is uneasy who is inconsistent. As Thomas Fuller says, "You can not make one side of the face laugh, and the other cry!" You can not have one-half your statute-book Jewish, and the other Christian; one-half of the statute-book Oriental, the other Saxon. You have granted that woman may be hung, therefore you must grant that woman may vote. You have granted that she may be taxed, therefore, on republican principles, you must grant that she ought to have a voice in fixing the laws of taxation--and this is, in fact, all that we claim--the whole of it. Now, I want to consider some of the objections that are made to this claim. Men say, "Woman is not fit to vote; she does not know enough; she has not sense enough to vote." I take this idea of the ballot as the Gibraltar of our claim, for this reason, because I am speaking in a democracy; I am speaking under republican institutions. The rule of despotism is that one class is made to protect the other; that the rich, the noble, the educated are a sort of probate court, to take care of the poor, the ignorant, and the common classes. Our fathers got rid of all that. They knocked it on the head by the simple principle, that no class is safe, unless government is so arranged that each class has in its own hands the means of protecting itself. That is the idea of republics. The Briton says to the poor man, "Be content; I am worth five millions, and I will protect you." And America says, "Thank you, sir; I had rather take care
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897  
898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

statute

 

protect

 

inconsistent

 

speaking

 

granted

 

change

 

members

 

republican

 

democracy

 

reason


taxation

 

institutions

 
ballot
 

Gibraltar

 

objections

 
republics
 

Briton

 

protecting

 

content

 
America

millions

 

arranged

 

ignorant

 

common

 
classes
 

probate

 

despotism

 
educated
 

fathers

 

principle


government

 

simple

 
fixing
 

knocked

 

halting

 

civilization

 

extending

 
fanaticism
 
asylum
 

lunatic


settled

 

contests

 

church

 

Calvinist

 

liberty

 

Fuller

 

Thomas

 
uneasy
 

principles

 

Jewish