FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70  
71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   >>   >|  
Romanists had been on the whole gently and justly used. But it was in reality, though they could not see it, after her the deluge. Who was to be Elizabeth's successor had been for years at once a serious and an unsettled question. There were three persons living when she died, each of whom could have put forward a claim to the Crown on various grounds. Humanly speaking, the decision was made by two groups of persons--the Careys and Cecils, and the Romanists of England--both of whom were determined that James of Scotland should succeed. The latter had been working for some time past, and had secured promises from James that he would extend special toleration to them. He was expected to look kindly on the party which had adhered to his mother--it would be difficult to say why, since in Scotland his adherents had always been at war with hers--and it was remembered that he had been born and baptised in the Church of Rome. The Roman party, therefore, wrought earnestly in his favour. Sir Thomas Tresham proclaimed him at Northampton, at considerable personal risk; his sons and Lord Monteagle assisted the Earl of Southampton to hold the Tower for James. The Pope, Clement the Eighth, was entirely on James's side, of whose conversion he entertained the warmest hopes. To the French Ambassador, Monsieur de Beaumont, James asserted that "he was no heretic, that is, refusing to recognise the truth; neither was he a Puritan, nor separated from the Church: he held episcopacy as necessary, and the Pope as the chief bishop, namely, the president and moderator of councils, but not the head nor superior." We in this nineteenth century, accustomed to ideas of complete and perpetual toleration, and alas! also to Gallio-like apathy and indifference, can scarcely form a conception of what was at that time the popular estimate of a Papist. A fair view of it is given by the following sarcastic description, written on the fly-leaf of a volume of manuscript sermons of this date. "The Blazon of a Papist [`priest' is erased] contrived prettily by som Herault of Armes in ye compasse of Armoury. "First. There is papist Rampant, a furious beast: 'tis written that the Diuell goes about like a roaring Lion, but the Diuell himselfe is not more fierce and rigorous then is papist where [he] is of force and ability to shew his tyranny: wittnes ye murthers, ye massacres, ye slaughters, ye poysoning, ye stabbing, ye burning, ye broyling, y
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70  
71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Scotland
 

Diuell

 

papist

 
written
 

Romanists

 

Papist

 
persons
 

Church

 

toleration

 
ability

nineteenth

 

councils

 

century

 
superior
 
accustomed
 

tyranny

 

perpetual

 

apathy

 
indifference
 

scarcely


Gallio

 

complete

 

moderator

 

bishop

 

heretic

 

massacres

 

murthers

 

refusing

 

asserted

 

Beaumont


French

 

Ambassador

 
Monsieur
 

recognise

 

wittnes

 
episcopacy
 

Puritan

 

separated

 

president

 

conception


contrived

 

prettily

 
Herault
 

erased

 

priest

 
manuscript
 

sermons

 
Blazon
 
broyling
 
furious