FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  
ive of the operations of the public powers.[49] The English constitution is indeed, as Mr. Bryce has described it, "a mass of precedents carried in men's minds or recorded in writing, dicta of lawyers or statesmen, customs, usages, (p. 044) understandings and beliefs, a number of statutes mixed up with customs and all covered over with a parasitic growth of legal decisions and political habits."[50] At no time has an attempt been made to collect and to reduce to writing this stupendous mass of scattered material, and no such attempt is likely ever to be made. "The English," as remarks the French critic Boutmy, "have left the different parts of their constitution where the waves of history have deposited them; they have not attempted to bring them together, to classify or complete them, or to make of it a consistent or coherent whole."[51] [Footnote 48: Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (7th ed., London, 1908), 22-29.] [Footnote 49: Convention occupies a large place in most political systems, even in countries which are governed under elaborate written constitutions. Their importance in the government of the United States is familiar (see Bryce, American Commonwealth, 3d ed., I., Chaps. 34-35). On the influence of conventions in France see H. Chardon, L'Administration de la France; les fonctionnaires (Paris, 1908), 79-105.] [Footnote 50: J. Bryce, Flexible and Rigid Constitutions, in Studies in History and Jurisprudence (London and New York, 1901), No. 3.] [Footnote 51: E. Boutmy, Studies in Constitutional Law: France--England--United States, trans. by E. M. Dicey (London, 1891), 6.] V. THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE CONSTITUTION *44. Aspects of Continuity and of Change.*--In pursuance of what has been said two observations, representing opposite aspects of the same truth, are pertinent. The first is that in respect to the principles and many of the practices of the English constitution it is pre-eminently true that, to employ a familiar phrase of Bishop Stubbs, the roots of the present lie deep in the past.[52] The second is that the English consti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

English

 
London
 

constitution

 
France
 

attempt

 
United
 
political
 

Boutmy

 

familiar


States
 
Studies
 

writing

 

customs

 

History

 
Jurisprudence
 

Constitutions

 

Flexible

 
powers
 

England


Constitutional

 

public

 
fonctionnaires
 

American

 

Commonwealth

 

influence

 

conventions

 
Administration
 
Chardon
 

eminently


employ

 

practices

 

respect

 
principles
 
phrase
 

Bishop

 

consti

 
Stubbs
 

present

 

pertinent


Aspects

 
Continuity
 

Change

 
CONSTITUTION
 

operations

 
FLEXIBILITY
 

pursuance

 

opposite

 

aspects

 

representing