FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  
Milloud believes that the policy by 1914 had demonstrated its failure, and that the fear of an industrial _debacle_ forced Germany to escape from an impossible economic position by throwing Europe into war. How far this is true it is difficult to determine.[8] It is evident, however, that the {125} difficulty of this German penetration of adjacent countries must have intensified a desire for an easier market in the colonies. The Italian trade for which Germany fought so hard must have seemed unremunerative and unpromising as compared with the practically monopolised market which France possessed in North Africa or with that which Germany could obtain through the Bagdad Railway and the penetration of Asia Minor. The sharpness of the conflict for nearer lying markets illustrated anew the necessity of securing colonial outlets. If, however, the competition among industrial countries to secure each other's markets results in national antagonism, the competition of the same nations for the exclusive possession of colonies and dependencies leads, as we have seen, to an equally bitter struggle. The choice seems to lie between the devil and the deep sea. It is no wonder therefore that as the rapid expansion of industry brings the great nations into ever keener antagonism, voices are raised against the whole imperialistic policy. Just as the German consumer objects to paying high prices for German commodities which the Belgian or Italian can buy cheap, so also opposition is encountered to a policy of extending colonial development at the expense and imminent risk of the nation and to the obvious benefit of certain preferred classes in the community. [1] "The Ruling Caste and Frenzied Finance in Germany." Boston, 1916, p. 104. [2] See in the first instance Milloud, _op. cit._, and Prof. Henri Hauser, "Les Methodes Allemandes d'expansion Economique," Paris, 1916. also G. Preziosi, "La Germania alia conquista dell' Italia," Florence, 1915. [3] _Op. cit._, pp. 104-5. His italics. [4] Milloud, _op. cit._, p. 110. [5] _Revue economique Internationale_, 1914, II, p. 259, quoted from Hauser (H.) "Les methodes allemandes d'expansion economique," p. 106. [6] Hauser, H., _op. cit._, p. 128. [7] The goods exported to foreign countries may show a profit if they are sold at a price less than the average cost of production but greater than the marginal cost. If it costs $100 a unit to produce a million units of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Germany

 
German
 

policy

 

Hauser

 

Milloud

 

countries

 
expansion
 
market
 

Italian

 
colonies

nations

 

antagonism

 

markets

 

colonial

 

competition

 

economique

 

industrial

 

penetration

 
produce
 

Boston


Frenzied

 

Finance

 

instance

 

marginal

 
greater
 

Ruling

 
preferred
 

opposition

 

encountered

 
extending

development

 

commodities

 

Belgian

 

expense

 

imminent

 

Methodes

 
classes
 

community

 

benefit

 

obvious


nation

 

million

 

Economique

 

quoted

 
Internationale
 
prices
 

methodes

 

allemandes

 
exported
 

foreign