FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   >>   >|  
-they are noon and morning effects with full lateral light. Be so kind as to match the color of a leaf in the sun (the darkest you like) as nearly as you can, and bring your matched color and set it beside one of these groups of trees, and take a blade of common grass, and set it beside any part of the fullest light of their foregrounds, and then talk about the truth of color of the old masters! And let not arguments respecting the sublimity or fidelity of _impression_ be brought forward here. I have nothing whatever to do with this at present. I am not talking about what is sublime, but about what is true. People attack Turner on this ground;--they never speak of beauty or sublimity with respect to him, but of nature and truth, and let them support their own favorite masters on the same grounds. Perhaps I may have the very deepest veneration for the _feeling_ of the old masters, but I must not let it influence me now--my business is to match colors, not to talk sentiment. Neither let it be said that I am going too much into details, and that general truths may be obtained by local falsehood. Truth is only to be measured by close comparison of actual facts; we may talk forever about it in generals, and prove nothing. We cannot tell what effect falsehood may produce on this or that person, but we can very well tell what is false and what is not, and if it produce on our senses the effect of truth, that only demonstrates their imperfection and inaccuracy, and need of cultivation. Turner's color is glaring to one person's sensations, and beautiful to another's. This proves nothing. Poussin's color is right to one, soot to another. This proves nothing. There is no means of arriving at any conclusion but close comparison of both with the known and demonstrable hues of nature, and this comparison will invariably turn Claude or Poussin into blackness, and even Turner into gray. Whatever depth of gloom may seem to invest the objects of a real landscape, yet a window with that landscape seen through it, will invariably appear a broad space of light as compared with the shade of the room walls; and this single circumstance may prove to us both the intensity and the diffusion of daylight in open air, and the necessity, if a picture is to be truthful in effect of color, that it should tell as a broad space of graduated illumination--not, as do those of the old masters, as a patch-work of black shades. Their works are nature in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
masters
 

Turner

 

nature

 

effect

 

comparison

 

landscape

 

invariably

 
proves
 

Poussin

 
sublimity

person

 

falsehood

 

produce

 

glaring

 

arriving

 
cultivation
 

conclusion

 
senses
 

beautiful

 

demonstrates


imperfection

 
inaccuracy
 

sensations

 

shades

 

circumstance

 

intensity

 

diffusion

 
single
 

compared

 

daylight


graduated
 

illumination

 
truthful
 

picture

 

necessity

 

Whatever

 

blackness

 

Claude

 

window

 

objects


invest

 

demonstrable

 

arguments

 
respecting
 
foregrounds
 

fullest

 
common
 

fidelity

 

impression

 

talking