FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>  
nvex, or arched as in the former; the horns rising from the sides of the salient edge or crest of the frontals; the plane of the occiput forming an acute angle with the frontal, and of quadrangular form; the curve of the horns outwards, upwards, and forwards; no mane; a deep dewlap; _thirteen pairs of ribs_; _tail long_; _udder four teats in a square_." This sub-genus comprises the Urus and the Domestic Ox. Subgeneric characters should be such as will clearly distinguish the animals of one sub-genus from those of another. But here we have set down, in the sub-genus Bubalus, tail _long_, slender; in the sub-genus Taurus, tail _long_; and although the epithet slender is not added in the latter case, yet in truth it ought to be, as the tail of Taurus is quite as slender as that of Bubalus. The udder of Bubalus is said to have four mammae; they are not stated to be in a square, but, on examination, I find they are so; the udder of Taurus has likewise four teats in a square. Thirteen pairs of ribs are set down as a distinguishing character of the sub-genus Taurus; but the Cape Buffalo, Domestic Buffalo, and the Manilla Buffalo (in the sub-genus Bubalus), and the Gaur (in the sub-genus Bison), all possess thirteen pairs of ribs. In the sub-genus Bison the tail is said to be _shorter_ than the tail of Bubalus; but on subjecting them to the infallible test of feet and inches, I find the tails of the Aurochs, Gaur, Yak, and Gayal, to be decidedly _longer_ than those of the Cape or the Manilla Buffalo. The legs of Bisons are stated to be more slender than those of Buffaloes,--the reverse of this is the fact in the instances which I have had an opportunity of observing. SPECIFIC DETAILS. The details of a system of scientific classification should be precise, methodical, and consistent; but the method observed by Col. Smith, in describing the lengths of animals, can scarcely be called either precise or consistent; for example, he states:-- 1st. That the Cape Buffalo is nine feet from _nose to ROOT of tail_. 2d. That the Gaur is twelve feet long _to the END of tail_. 3d. That the Aurochs is ten feet three inches _from nose to tail_. 4th. That the Domestic Buffalo is eight feet six inches long, _without mentioning either nose or tail_. In none of these cases can we be even proximately certain of the length of the animal. In the first instance we may err to the amount of the length of the head; as it i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>  



Top keywords:

Buffalo

 

Bubalus

 

slender

 
Taurus
 
inches
 

square

 
Domestic
 

precise

 

Manilla

 

Aurochs


stated
 

consistent

 

animals

 

thirteen

 

length

 
animal
 

opportunity

 

SPECIFIC

 

proximately

 
system

details

 
instance
 

DETAILS

 

observing

 

instances

 

amount

 

Bisons

 
longer
 

Buffaloes

 

reverse


scientific

 

twelve

 

describing

 

lengths

 

decidedly

 

called

 

scarcely

 

states

 

classification

 

mentioning


methodical

 

observed

 

method

 

examination

 

forwards

 

upwards

 
outwards
 

dewlap

 

Subgeneric

 

characters