FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332  
333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   >>   >|  
And this was the grand aim of his _Dialectic_--to elicit, to bring to light the truths which are already in the mind--"a maieusis" a kind of intellectual midwifery[561]--a delivering of the mind of the ideas with which it was pregnant. [Footnote 560: As in the "Phaedo," Secs. 48-57; "Phaedrus," Secs. 52-64; "Republic," bk. x.] [Footnote 561: "Theaetetus," Secs. 17-20.] It is thus, at first sight, obvious that it was a higher and more comprehensive science than the art of deduction. For it was directed to the discovery and establishment of First Principles. Its sole object was the discovery of truth. His dialectic was an _analytical_ and _inductive method_. "In Dialectic Science," says _Alcinous_, "there is a dividing and a defining, and an analyzing, and, moreover, that which is inductive and syllogistic."[562] Even _Bacon_, who is usually styled "the Father of the Inductive method," and who, too often, speaks disparagingly of Plato, is constrained to admit that he followed the inductive method. "An induction such as will be of advantage for the invention and demonstration of Arts and Sciences must distinguish the essential nature of things (naturam) by proper rejections and exclusions, and then after as many of these negatives as are sufficient, by comprising, above all (super), the positives. Up to this time this had not been done, nor even attempted, _except by Plato alone, who, in order to attain his definitions and ideas, has used, to a certain extent, the method of Induction_."[563] [Footnote 562: "Introduction to the Doctrines of Plato," vol. vi. p. 249. "The Platonic Method was the method of induction."--Cousin's "History of Philosophy," vol. i. p. 307.] [Footnote 563: "Novum Organum," vol. i. p. 105.] The process of investigation adopted by Plato thus corresponds with the inductive method of modern times, with this simple difference, that Bacon conducted science into the world of _matter_, whilst Plato directed it to the world of _mind_. The dialectic of Plato aimed at the discovery of the "laws of thought;" the modern inductive philosophy aims at the discovery of the "laws of nature." The latter concerns itself chiefly with the inquiry after the "causes" of material phenomena; the former concerned itself with the inquiry after the "first principles" of all knowledge and of all existence. Both processes are, therefore, carried on by _interrogation_. The analysis which seeks for a law of nature pro
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332  
333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
method
 

inductive

 

Footnote

 

discovery

 

nature

 

Dialectic

 
directed
 
modern
 

science

 
dialectic

inquiry

 

induction

 
sufficient
 

comprising

 

extent

 

negatives

 

Doctrines

 

Introduction

 
Induction
 
attempted

definitions

 

positives

 
attain
 
corresponds
 

concerned

 

principles

 

knowledge

 
phenomena
 

material

 

concerns


chiefly

 

existence

 

analysis

 

interrogation

 
processes
 

carried

 
philosophy
 

Organum

 
process
 

Philosophy


Method

 

Cousin

 

History

 
investigation
 

adopted

 

matter

 

whilst

 

thought

 

conducted

 
simple