FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225  
226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>   >|  
n, and yet the States have all been restored to their original position as States in the Union ... Certainly if the courts can consider any question settled, this is one.... "Our province," concluded Chief Justice Waite, "is to decide what the law is, not to declare what it should be.... Being unanimously of the opinion that the Constitution of the United States does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one, and that the Constitutions and laws of the several States which commit that important trust to men alone are not necessarily void, we affirm the judgment of the Court below." "A states-rights document," Susan called this decision and she scored it as inconsistent with the policies of a Republican administration which, through the Civil War amendments, had established federal control over the rights and privileges of citizens. If the Constitution does not confer the right of suffrage, she asked herself, why does it define the qualifications of those voting for members of the House of Representatives? How about the enfranchisement of Negroes by federal amendment or the enfranchisement of foreigners? Why did the federal government interfere in her case, instead of leaving it in the hands of the state of New York? Like most abolitionists, Susan had always regarded the principles of the Declaration of Independence as underlying the Constitution and as the essence of constitutional law. In her opinion, the interpretation of the Constitution in the Virginia Minor case was not only out of harmony with the spirit of the Declaration of Independence, but also contrary to the wise counsel of the great English jurist, Sir Edward Coke, who said, "Whenever the question of liberty runs doubtful, the decision must be given in favor of liberty."[313] In the face of such a ruling by the highest court in the land, she was helpless. Women were shut out of the Constitution and denied its protection. From here on there was only one course to follow, to press again for a Sixteenth Amendment to enfranchise women. FOOTNOTES: [304] Ms., Diary, April 26, 1873. [305] _Trial_, p. 17. [306] _Ibid._, pp. 62-68. [307] Ms., Diary, June 18, 1873. [308] Susan B. Anthony Scrapbook, 1873, Library of Congress. [309] _Trial_, pp. 81-85. [310] This booklet also included the speeches of Susan B. Anthony and Matilda Joslyn Gage, delivered prior to the trial, and a short appraisal of the trial, _Judge Hunt and the Right of T
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225  
226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Constitution

 

States

 

federal

 

suffrage

 

confer

 
rights
 

decision

 

liberty

 
enfranchisement
 

opinion


Anthony
 
question
 

Independence

 

Declaration

 
highest
 

ruling

 

helpless

 

denied

 

Virginia

 
interpretation

doubtful

 

jurist

 
Whenever
 

counsel

 

contrary

 

spirit

 
harmony
 

Edward

 
English
 
booklet

included

 

Scrapbook

 
Library
 

Congress

 

speeches

 

Matilda

 

appraisal

 

Joslyn

 

delivered

 
Sixteenth

Amendment

 

enfranchise

 

follow

 

FOOTNOTES

 

protection

 
government
 

commit

 

important

 

Constitutions

 
unanimously