FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287  
288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   >>  
own" UFO reports, there are as many opinions as to what the bright blob of light could have been as there are people who've seen the photo. "Some kind of light phenomenon" is the frequent opinion of those who don't believe. They point out that there is no shadow of any kind of a circular object showing on the ground--no shadow, nothing "solid." But if you care to take the time you can show that if the object, assuming that this is what it was, was above 4,000 feet the shadow would fall out of the picture. Then all you get is a blank look from the light phenomenon theorists. With the sighting from the RB-29 and the photograph, all of the other UFO reports that Blue Book has collected and all of those that came out of the European Flap, the big question--the key question-- is: What have the last two years of UFO activity brought out? Have there been any important developments? Some good reports have come in and the Air Force is sitting on them. During 1954 they received some 450 reports, and once again July was the peak month. In the first half of 1955 they had 189. But I can assure you that these reports add nothing more as far as proof is concerned. The quality of the reports has improved, but they still offer nothing more than the same circumstantial evidence that we presented to the panel of scientists in early 1953. There have been no reports in which the speed or altitude of a UFO has been measured, there have been no reliable photographs that show any details of a UFO, and there is no hardware. There is still no real proof. So a public statement that was made in 1952 still holds true: "The _possibility_ of the existence of interplanetary craft has never been denied by the Air Force, _but_ UFO reports offer absolutely no authentic evidence that such interplanetary spacecraft do exist." But with the UFO, what is lacking in proof is always made up for in opinions. To get a qualified opinion, I wrote to a friend, Frederick C. Durant. Mr. Durant, who is presently the director of a large Army Ordnance test station, is also a past president of the American Rocket Society and president of the International Astronautical Federation. For those who are not familiar with these organizations, the American Rocket Society is an organization established to promote interest and research in space flight and lists as its members practically every prominent scientist and engineer in the professional fields allied to aeronaut
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287  
288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   >>  



Top keywords:

reports

 

shadow

 

president

 

Society

 

Rocket

 

American

 

interplanetary

 

evidence

 

question

 
Durant

phenomenon

 
object
 
opinions
 

opinion

 
statement
 

denied

 

public

 

hardware

 
members
 

existence


details

 

possibility

 

measured

 
fields
 
professional
 

engineer

 

allied

 

aeronaut

 

scientists

 

scientist


practically

 
reliable
 

altitude

 

prominent

 

photographs

 

station

 

presented

 

promote

 
Ordnance
 

presently


director
 
Federation
 

organizations

 

Astronautical

 

established

 

organization

 

International

 
interest
 

lacking

 
authentic