nate house."--Ibid., June 4. The committee decides that it will add
new members to its number, but they will be taken only from all "good
sans-cullote; no notary, no notary's clerk, no lawyers nor their clerks,
no banker nor rich landlord" being admissible, unless he gives evidence
of unmistakable civism since 1789.--Cf. F7, 2497 (section of the Droits
de l'Homme), F7, 2484 (section of the Halle-au-ble), the resemblance in
orthography and in their acts; the registry of the Piques section (F7,
2475) is one of the most interesting; here may be found the details of
the appearance of the ministers before it; the committee that examines
them does not even spell their names correctly, "Clavier" being often
written for Claviere, and "Goyer" for Gohier.]
[Footnote 34150: Buchez et Roux, XXVIII. 19.]
[Footnote 34151: Buchez et Roux, XXVII.357. Official reports of the
commune, June 1.]
[Footnote 34152: Meillan, 307.--"Fragment," by Lanuinais.--"Diurnal," of
Beaulieu, June 2.--Buchez et Roux, XXVII. 399 (speech by Barere).]
[Footnote 34153: Buchez et Roux, XXVII. 357. Official reports of the
commune, June 1.]
[Footnote 34154: Meillan, 53, 58, 307. Buchez et Roux, XXVIII. 14
(Precis, by Gordas).]
[Footnote 34155: Buchez et Roux, XXVII 359. Official reports of the
commune, June 1. "One member of the Council stated that on going to the
Beaurepaire section he was not well received; that the president of
this section spoke uncivilly to him and took him for an imaginary
municipalist; that he was threatened with the lock-up, and that his
liberty was solely due to the brave citizens of the Sans-culottes
section and the gunners of the Beaurepaire section who went with
him."--Preparations for the investment began on the 1st of June.
("Archives Nationales," F7, 2497, official reports of the Droits de
l'Homme section, June 1.) Orders of Henriot to the commandant of the
section to send "400 homme et la compagnie de canonier avec le 2 pieces
de canon au Carouzel le long des Thuilerie plasse de la Revolution."]
[Footnote 34156: "Lanjuinais states 100,000 men, Meillan 50,000; the
deputies of the Somme say 60,000, but without any evidence. Judging by
various indications I should put the number much lower, on account of
the disarmament and absentees: say 30,000 men, the same as May 31.]
[Footnote 34157: Mortimer-Ternaux, VII. 566. Letter of the deputy
Loiseau: "I passed through the whole of one battalion; the men all
said that they
|