FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121  
122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   >>   >|  
ld be alive. As both he and Ajoodia Pershad have been many years dead, I commit no breach of confidence in now telling the story. The picture purporting to be that of the Nana having been published in 1857, it rightly forms a reminiscence of the Mutiny, although much of the following tale occurred several years earlier; but to make the history of the picture complete, the facts which led to it must be noticed. There are but few Europeans now in India who remember the scandal connected with the trial of Ajoodia Pershad, the commissariat contractor, for payment for the supplies and carriage of the army throughout the second Sikh war. When it came to a final settlement of his accounts with the Commissariat Department, Ajoodia Pershad claimed three and a half _crores_ of rupees (equal to three and a half millions sterling), in excess of what the auditor would pass as justly due to him; and the Commissariat Department, backed by the Government of India, not only repudiated the claim, but put Ajoodia Pershad on his trial for falsification of accounts and attempting to defraud the Government. There being no high courts in those days, nor trial by jury, corrupt or otherwise, for natives in the Upper Provinces, an order of the Governor-General in Council was passed for the trial of Ajoodia Pershad by special commission, with the judge-advocate-general as prosecutor. The trial was ordered to be held at Meerut, and the commission assembled there, commencing its sittings in the Artillery mess-house during the cold weather of 1851-52. There were no barristers or pleaders in India in those days--at least in the Mofussil, and but few in the presidency towns; but Ajoodia Pershad, being a very wealthy man, sent an agent to England, and engaged the services of Mr. John Lang, barrister-at-law, to come out and defend him. John Lang left England in May, 1851, and came out round the Cape in one of Green's celebrated liners, the _Nile_, and he reached Meerut about December, when the trial commenced. Everything went swimmingly with the prosecution till Mr. Lang began his cross-examination of the witnesses, he having reserved his privilege till he heard the whole case for the prosecution. Directly the cross-examination commenced, the weakness of the Government case became apparent. I need not now recall how the commissary-general, the deputy commissary-general, and their assistants were made to contradict each other, and to contradict thems
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121  
122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ajoodia

 

Pershad

 

Government

 

general

 

Commissariat

 

England

 

Department

 

accounts

 

Meerut

 
commission

commenced

 
examination
 
prosecution
 

picture

 
contradict
 

commissary

 

apparent

 

advocate

 
weather
 

deputy


weakness

 

Mofussil

 

pleaders

 
Directly
 
barristers
 

prosecutor

 

recall

 

commencing

 

assembled

 

ordered


Artillery

 
presidency
 

sittings

 

assistants

 

special

 

swimmingly

 

celebrated

 

December

 
reached
 

liners


defend
 
privilege
 

wealthy

 

Everything

 

reserved

 

barrister

 

witnesses

 
engaged
 

services

 
history