FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813  
814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   >>   >|  
. But have you considered in doing this to what an incompetent jury you are possibly consigning your case, and with it the hopes of multitudes of your sisters, who, less favored than yourself, in not actually having been allowed to enter the sacred precincts of the polls, have put their trust in you as in one who should not fail, sooner or later, to achieve a victory for herself and for us all? Have you considered the result of white male legislation for nearly one hundred years, in elaborating a jury that must inevitably consist of fools or knaves, and twelve of these to declare in unison upon a case of which they have formed no previous opinion, though the papers have rung with it, and you have lectured every night for more than a month to crowded houses upon it? But even this difficulty you are able to meet, and we leave our destiny in your hands with unfaltering hope and faith, saying only, as many a time before, God bless Susan B. Anthony.... In conclusion, let me urge upon you, dear friends, one and all, that each man and woman of you shall work for impartial suffrage as though the welfare of our beloved country depended upon the devotion of each single life, and the day is ours. I am now and always yours for liberty, ISABELLA BEECHER HOOKER. WASHINGTON, May 5, 1873. MISS SUSAN B. ANTHONY:--Your favor requesting my opinion of the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the New Orleans and Bradwell cases, was received yesterday. I had not then seen those decisions, indeed they were not ready for distribution until to-day. I have very hastily run over them and only feel prepared to say that there is nothing in them necessarily conclusive of the suffrage cases. The opinion of the Court in the New Orleans cases is given by a bare majority, four out of the nine justices dissenting, and the majority expressly say: "We hold ourselves excused from defining the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, which no State can abridge until some case involving those privileges may make it necessary to do so." This language leaves us entirely at liberty to present the question whether suffrage is one of these "privileges" to t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813  
814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

privileges

 

opinion

 

suffrage

 

majority

 

Orleans

 

liberty

 

considered

 

decisions

 

States

 
United

Supreme

 
requesting
 
recent
 

abridge

 
received
 

Bradwell

 

involving

 

leaves

 
language
 

ISABELLA


yesterday

 

BEECHER

 

HOOKER

 
WASHINGTON
 
ANTHONY
 

conclusive

 

necessarily

 

prepared

 

excused

 

dissenting


present

 
justices
 

distribution

 

citizens

 

expressly

 

hastily

 

defining

 

question

 
immunities
 

result


legislation
 
victory
 

sooner

 

achieve

 

hundred

 

knaves

 

twelve

 
declare
 

unison

 
consist