FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>  
es and limbs contrasted with the spiral and radiating folds of drapery, or rich clusters of leaves and fruits, the forms of animals and the wings of birds--these are his decorative resources. [Egyptian Reliefs] The early stages of sculpture in relief may be seen in the monumental work of ancient Egypt. Simple incised work appears to have been the first stage, and the forms afterwards slightly modelled or rounded at the edges into the hollow of the sunk outline. Large figures and tables of hieroglyphic inscription were thus cut upon vast mural surfaces, and carried across the joints of the masonry, without disturbing the flatness and repose of the wall surface (p. 195[f106]). The Egyptians, indeed, seem to have treated their walls more as if they were books for record and statement, symbol and hieroglyphic. [Illustration (f106): Egyptian System of Sculptured Relief: Thebes.] Messrs. Perrot and Chipiez, in their "History of Ancient Art in Egypt," speak of three processes in the treatment of Egyptian reliefs (vol. ii., p. 284): 1. That followed by the Greeks, in which the figures are left standing out from a smooth bed, sometimes slightly hollowed near the contours (see illustration, p. 196[fig106]). 2. Where the figures are modelled in relief in a sunk hollow, from an inch to one and a half inch deep. 3. Where the surface of the figures and the bed or field of relief are kept on one level (see illustration, p. 196[f107]), the contours indicated by hollow lines cut into the stone; very little modelling, little more than silhouette, in which the outline is shown by a hollow instead of by the stroke of a pencil or brush. One would be inclined to reverse the order of these three processes, on the supposition that No. 3 was the earliest process, and that it arose, as I have conjectured, from the practice of representing forms by incised lines only. There is certainly a strong family likeness as to method between the Egyptian reliefs and the Assyrian, the Persian, and the archaic Greek; and there is a far greater difference in treatment between archaic Greek relief sculpture and the work of the Phidian period than between the archaic work of the three races named. The strictly mural and decorative conditions which governed ancient sculpture no doubt gave to Greek sculpture in its perfection a certain dignity, simplicity, and restraint, and also a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>  



Top keywords:

sculpture

 

relief

 

figures

 

hollow

 

Egyptian

 

archaic

 

treatment

 
contours
 

surface

 

outline


reliefs
 
hieroglyphic
 

processes

 

illustration

 
decorative
 

incised

 
ancient
 
slightly
 

modelled

 

period


difference

 

Phidian

 
strictly
 

dignity

 

perfection

 

simplicity

 
hollowed
 

restraint

 

governed

 
conditions

modelling

 

fig106

 

method

 

process

 

earliest

 
likeness
 
conjectured
 

strong

 

representing

 

family


practice

 

Assyrian

 

stroke

 

pencil

 

silhouette

 

supposition

 
reverse
 

inclined

 

Persian

 
greater