FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   >>  
ainly at a later period. 1559. December 17.--He was an invited guest at the consecration of Matthew Parker at Lambeth, as Archbishop of Canterbury, "and many years after, by his testimony, confuted those lewd and loud lies which the Papists tell of the Nag's Head in Cheapside."--(Fuller's "Worthies," quoted in Notes and Queries, 1st S. Three, 244.) 1604. February.--He was "at the head of a commission to discover and expel all Catholic priests."--(Memorials of the Howard Family, quoted ibidem, Three 309.--The quoter adds that Howard "was certainly a Protestant in the reign of Queen Elizabeth.") 1604. May [?] "Only we forewarn you that in the performance of these ceremonies [ratification by King of Spain of treaty of peace with England], which is likely to be done in the King's Chapel, you have especial care that it be not done in the forenoon, in the time of Mass, to the scandal of our religion, but rather in the afternoon, at what time their service is more free from note of superstition."--(King James the First to Lord Howard, then Earl of Nottingham and Ambassador to Spain. Biographies Brit, page 2679; quoted in Notes and Queries, 1st S., Three 244.) 1604. "On Friday, the last of this Month, His Catholick Majesty ratified the Peace upon Oath in a great chamber of the Palace... It was pretended that the Clergy would not suffer this to be done in a Church or Chapel where neglect of reverence of the Holy Sacrament should give scandal."--(Collins' Peerage, Four 272, quoted ibidem.) [It may be urged that Lord Howard, as Ambassador of a Protestant King, would feel himself obliged to act on behalf of his master, showing no more nor less reverence than James would have done himself. But is it at all likely that, had such been his wish, James would have selected for this office a man who could not act according to the belief of his master without committing sacrilege according to his own? The want of reverence must have been expected from Lord Nottingham or his suite, for there was no one else present who was not a devout Romanist]. 1605. When Lord Monteagle delivered the anonymous letter winch revealed the Gunpowder Plot to Lord Salisbury, the second person to whom the latter confided the transaction was Lord Nottingham.--(Baker's "Chronicle," page 508.) 1605. He sat as one of the Commissioners for the trial of Garnet and other conspirators, after the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot--(Archaeologia, v
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   >>  



Top keywords:

quoted

 

Howard

 

Nottingham

 

reverence

 

Chapel

 

ibidem

 

Protestant

 

Ambassador

 

Gunpowder

 

master


scandal

 

Queries

 

belief

 
December
 

selected

 

invited

 
showing
 
office
 

behalf

 

Sacrament


Collins

 

Lambeth

 
Archbishop
 

neglect

 

Peerage

 

obliged

 

Matthew

 

Parker

 

consecration

 

confided


transaction

 

person

 

Salisbury

 

Chronicle

 

conspirators

 

discovery

 

Archaeologia

 

Garnet

 

Commissioners

 

revealed


expected

 

sacrilege

 

Church

 
present
 

devout

 

anonymous

 

letter

 

delivered

 
Monteagle
 
Romanist