FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   >>  
ch of a concession was made: "If your work proves to be excellent, your shortage will be disregarded." So she went to work with that incubus, or stimulus--whichever you wish to regard it--over her. Neither she nor her committee knew how to plan her work, not knowing whether it was to be for two years or for three. And not until the very close of her year's work was her status determined--full credit then being granted for her former degrees. Miss May's sane comment now is, "I would not advise any one to try to shorten the regular four-year undergraduate period of study." (Author 1918) It is demoralizing to both students and teachers. I refer to the inevitable outcome of such a system; some students (sometimes few and sometimes many) develop considerable skill in "working the Prof." Teachers offering elective courses are constantly under great temptation and students are shrewd enough to know it. And again, under the same count: it is freely claimed by both teachers and students that the cheating in examinations, of which we doubtless have our share (some claim much more than our share, tho personally I doubt it), is very greatly increased if not largely caused by our system of marking. In hopes of remedying this some of the students are now urging the adoption of the "honor system" of conducting examinations. (6) It is impossible to create uniform standards corresponding to our various grades. There are as many standards for each grade as there are instructors. A grade of work for which one instructor would give an "A" (1.3), another would give a "B" (1.2) and still another a "C" (1.0). Standards can not be fixt. To show how greatly they differ, in marking the work for the first term of this year one instructor gave only seven per cent of his students extra credit, while another thus rewarded more than seventy per cent of his. This range, however, is abnormal. But a range of twenty-five per cent to sixty-five per cent is not, even tho the two instructors have approximately the same students and do approximately the same grade of work. Other evils and weaknesses might be mentioned, but these are sufficient to show the tendency. On the other hand, what strong paints can be urged as an offset? The only ones I have ever heard offered are: (1) it is an incentive, and (2) it does enable students to shorten the period of undergradu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   >>  



Top keywords:
students
 

system

 

examinations

 
period
 

shorten

 

teachers

 

greatly

 

marking

 

approximately

 

standards


instructors

 
instructor
 

credit

 
regard
 
Standards
 

differ

 

concession

 

proves

 

grades

 

knowing


strong

 

paints

 

sufficient

 

tendency

 

offset

 
enable
 

undergradu

 

incentive

 

offered

 

abnormal


twenty

 

committee

 
uniform
 

rewarded

 

seventy

 

weaknesses

 

mentioned

 

Neither

 

develop

 

considerable


granted
 
outcome
 

disregarded

 

courses

 

constantly

 
elective
 

offering

 
working
 
Teachers
 

inevitable