FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157  
158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>   >|  
eases to be an enemy."[219] In the case of Sofian there was no perfidy, treachery, or violation of faith, nor was there any permission granted by Mohammad for his assassination. He sent, if it be proved he did (but it is never proved), Abdullah against Sofian who had made every preparation of arms, and who had mustered together several Bedouin tribes to attack Mohammad, to fight and kill him; it was a straightforward course allowed by the usages of the military law. Mohammad had distinctly and expressly interdicted _perfidy, deceit and assassination_. "Do not," said he, charging his commanders and soldiers on the point of marching for a military expedition, "commit perfidy, and do not mutilate, and do not kill a child."[220] He also laid down the golden maxim, "_Belief is the restraint to assassination. No believer should commit assassination_."[221] 5.--_Abu Rafe._ [Sidenote: 53. Abu Rafe.] Abu Rafe, called also Sallam Ibn Abul Hokeik, was the chief of Bani Nazeer, who had warred with the Moslems at Medina, and had been banished to Khyber. He had taken a prominent part in the assembling of most of the Bedouin tribes at the war of the confederates when they besieged Medina. Subsequently, he had excited Bani Fezara and other Bedouin tribes to carry on their depredations among the Moslems. A band of the latter was dispatched to inflict condign punishment upon him, and he met with his death at their hands. But the account of his execution are full of contradictions and discrepancies. But none of these diverse stories has, that Mohammad commanded the assassination of Abu Rafe, while Ibn Ishak gives no account of him at all. Ibn Hisham has--"That Abu Rafe had brought the confederate army against Mohammad, and some of Khazraj had asked permission to kill him, and Mohammad permitted them."[222] Sir W. Muir narrates that Mohammad "gave them command to make away with Abul Huckeick,"[223] whilst the Secretary of Wakidi, whom he follows, simply says, "He gave command to kill him." "_Making away with a person_" creates an idea of secret murder tantamount to 'assassination,' but such is not the wording of the original. _Sending a party to kill_, or _fight with an enemy_ are synonymous, and permissible by the international or military law, the Arab mode of fighting mostly consisting of single combats. 6.--_Oseir-bin Zarim._[224] [Sidenote: 54. Oseir-bin Zarim.] Oseir-ibn Zarim, the chief of Bani Nazeer, had maintaine
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157  
158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Mohammad

 

assassination

 
perfidy
 

tribes

 

Bedouin

 

military

 

commit

 
Nazeer
 

command

 

Medina


account

 

Sidenote

 

Moslems

 
Sofian
 
proved
 

permission

 

brought

 
confederate
 

Hisham

 

Khazraj


single
 

permitted

 
commanded
 

violation

 

execution

 

treachery

 

maintaine

 

contradictions

 

stories

 
diverse

discrepancies

 

wording

 

original

 
tantamount
 

murder

 
secret
 
Sending
 

fighting

 

international

 
synonymous

permissible

 
creates
 
person
 

Huckeick

 

combats

 

narrates

 

whilst

 
simply
 
Making
 

Secretary