FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335  
336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   >>   >|  
lected un-opposed, and retained his seat until his death, June 15, 1884. 1864.--Householders, whose rates were compounded for by their landlords, had hitherto not been allowed to exercise their right of voting, but the decision given in their favour, Feb. 17, 1864, was the means of raising the number of voters' names on the register to over 40,000. 1865, July.--Whether from fear of the newly-formed Liberal Association (which was inaugurated in February for the avowed purpose of controlling the Parliamentary elections in the borough and adjoining county divisions), or the lack of a sufficiently popular local man, there was no opposition offered to the return of Messrs. Scholefield and Bright at the election of this year. 1867, July.--On the death of Mr. Scholefield, Mr. George Dixon was nominated by the Liberals and opposed by Mr. Sampson S. Lloyd The result was:-- Geo. Dixon .. .. .. ..5,819 Returned. S.S. Lloyd .. .. .. ..4,214 1868, November.--This was the first election after the passing of the Reform Bill of 1867, by which Birmingham became entitled to send three members to the House of Commons; and as the Bill contained a proviso (generally known as the "minority clause") that each voter should be limited to giving his support to two only of the candidates, an immense amount of interest was taken in the interest that ensued. The Conservatives brought forward Mr. Sampson S. Lloyd and Mr. Sebastian Evans, the Liberal Association nominating Messrs. John Bright, George Dixon, and Philip Henry Muntz (brother to the old member G.F. Muntz). The election has become historical from the cleverly-manipulated scheme devised by the Liberal Association, and the strict enforcement of their "vote-as-you're-told" policy, by which, abnegating all personal freedom or choice in the matter the electors under the influence of the Association were moved at the will of the chiefs of their party. That the new tactics were successful is shown by the returns:-- George Dixon .. .. .. 15,188 } P.H. Muntz .. .. .. 14,614 }Returned. John Bright .. .. .. 14,601 } S.S. Lloyd .. .. .. 8,700 S. Evans .. .. .. 7,061 1868, Dec. 21.--Mr. Bright having been appointed President of the Board of Trade, was re-elected without opposition. He held office till the close of 1870, but for a long time was absent from Parliament through illness. 1873, Aug. 6.--Mr. John Jaffray, one of the p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335  
336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Bright

 

Association

 
George
 

election

 
Liberal
 

opposition

 

Returned

 

Sampson

 

Scholefield

 

interest


Messrs

 
opposed
 

enforcement

 

strict

 
cleverly
 
manipulated
 
scheme
 

devised

 

policy

 
choice

matter
 

electors

 

freedom

 

personal

 
historical
 
abnegating
 

ensued

 

Conservatives

 

brought

 

forward


candidates
 

immense

 

amount

 

Sebastian

 

member

 

influence

 

brother

 

nominating

 

retained

 
Philip

office

 
President
 
elected
 

Jaffray

 

absent

 
Parliament
 

illness

 
appointed
 

successful

 
returns